Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 58121 - 58130 of 68288 for law.
Search results 58121 - 58130 of 68288 for law.
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 893.80(4) involves a question of law that we review de novo. See Kettner v. Wausau Ins. Cos., 191 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62502 - 2011-04-06
. § 893.80(4) involves a question of law that we review de novo. See Kettner v. Wausau Ins. Cos., 191 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62502 - 2011-04-06
State v. Ronnie A. Malloy
that it can be said as a matter of law that no trier of fact, acting reasonably, could have found guilt beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17858 - 2005-04-26
that it can be said as a matter of law that no trier of fact, acting reasonably, could have found guilt beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17858 - 2005-04-26
[PDF]
State v. Allan P. Nelson
of law for our de novo review. Rochelt, 165 Wis.2d at 379, 477 N.W.2d at 661. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10219 - 2017-09-20
of law for our de novo review. Rochelt, 165 Wis.2d at 379, 477 N.W.2d at 661. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10219 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
express the panel’s view of the law, the panel may incorporate the [circuit] court’s opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191252 - 2017-09-21
express the panel’s view of the law, the panel may incorporate the [circuit] court’s opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191252 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Walter L. Williams
by the facts. It is a well-settled principle of law that the trial court exercises discretion in sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10907 - 2017-09-20
by the facts. It is a well-settled principle of law that the trial court exercises discretion in sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10907 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Margaret J. Magnant v. Richard K. Hand
that Jezo is no longer good law because § 700.20, STATS., was enacted subsequent to Jezo. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13589 - 2017-09-21
that Jezo is no longer good law because § 700.20, STATS., was enacted subsequent to Jezo. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13589 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
February 16, 2005, order, it is now the law of the case. State v. Stuart, 2003 WI 73, ¶23, 262 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27369 - 2014-09-15
February 16, 2005, order, it is now the law of the case. State v. Stuart, 2003 WI 73, ¶23, 262 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27369 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
if it “examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law, and, demonstrating a rational process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27853 - 2014-09-15
if it “examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law, and, demonstrating a rational process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27853 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on Agnew’s character. The resulting sentence was within the potential maximum authorized by law, see State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757254 - 2024-01-30
on Agnew’s character. The resulting sentence was within the potential maximum authorized by law, see State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757254 - 2024-01-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
they are clearly erroneous. Whether the facts satisfy the statutory standard is a question of law that we review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272004 - 2020-07-23
they are clearly erroneous. Whether the facts satisfy the statutory standard is a question of law that we review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272004 - 2020-07-23