Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5821 - 5830 of 83344 for case search.
Search results 5821 - 5830 of 83344 for case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
said he did not have an ID and would not allow himself to be searched), and brought him to the squad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93381 - 2014-09-15
said he did not have an ID and would not allow himself to be searched), and brought him to the squad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93381 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Officers sought to search the apartment Watt shared with his girlfriend, Danella Thurman. In a phone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1048544 - 2025-12-10
Officers sought to search the apartment Watt shared with his girlfriend, Danella Thurman. In a phone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1048544 - 2025-12-10
[PDF]
WI 59
2021 WI 59 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2019AP1983-CR COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377956 - 2021-06-17
2021 WI 59 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2019AP1983-CR COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377956 - 2021-06-17
[PDF]
State v. Donald R. Goldsworthy
on Goldsworthy’s postconviction motion.1 On May 28, 1994, police officers obtained a search warrant, entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11211 - 2017-09-19
on Goldsworthy’s postconviction motion.1 On May 28, 1994, police officers obtained a search warrant, entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11211 - 2017-09-19
State v. Donald R. Goldsworthy
postconviction motion.[1] On May 28, 1994, police officers obtained a search warrant, entered Goldsworthy’s home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11211 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion.[1] On May 28, 1994, police officers obtained a search warrant, entered Goldsworthy’s home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11211 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, apprehending him in the foyer just inside the lower unit. Neibauer conducted a pat-down search of Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50188 - 2010-05-24
, apprehending him in the foyer just inside the lower unit. Neibauer conducted a pat-down search of Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50188 - 2010-05-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
in the foyer just inside the lower unit. Neibauer conducted a pat-down search of Smith, finding no drugs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50188 - 2014-09-15
in the foyer just inside the lower unit. Neibauer conducted a pat-down search of Smith, finding no drugs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50188 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
after being arrested for three other retail theft cases, one of which also had a bail-jumping count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143725 - 2015-06-29
after being arrested for three other retail theft cases, one of which also had a bail-jumping count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143725 - 2015-06-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
previously released from custody after being arrested for three other retail theft cases, one of which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143725 - 2017-09-21
previously released from custody after being arrested for three other retail theft cases, one of which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143725 - 2017-09-21
Ronald A. Keith, Sr. v. State
and subjected him to strip searches, random urinalysis, random room searches, and other acts of control beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2245 - 2005-03-31
and subjected him to strip searches, random urinalysis, random room searches, and other acts of control beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2245 - 2005-03-31