Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5821 - 5830 of 12351 for o's.
Search results 5821 - 5830 of 12351 for o's.
COURT OF APPEALS
for Marquette County: Richard O. Wright, Judge. Reversed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Sherman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75243 - 2011-12-14
for Marquette County: Richard O. Wright, Judge. Reversed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Sherman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75243 - 2011-12-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. In checking the box, the petitioner indicated that she was requesting that the court “[o]rder the Injunction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=729700 - 2023-11-16
. In checking the box, the petitioner indicated that she was requesting that the court “[o]rder the Injunction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=729700 - 2023-11-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(1996). “[N]o hearing is required if the defendant fails to allege sufficient facts in his or her
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542850 - 2022-07-19
(1996). “[N]o hearing is required if the defendant fails to allege sufficient facts in his or her
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542850 - 2022-07-19
[PDF]
State v. Kevin M. Salm
-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Marquette County: RICHARD O. WRIGHT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15446 - 2017-09-21
-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Marquette County: RICHARD O. WRIGHT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15446 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mark J. Modory
vehicle while intoxicated. Section 346.63(3)(b), Stats., defines “[o]perate” as “the physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10304 - 2005-03-31
vehicle while intoxicated. Section 346.63(3)(b), Stats., defines “[o]perate” as “the physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10304 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Farina Building Co., Inc. v. General Lumber & Supply Co., Inc.
Item.” In addition, the building contract stated that “[n]o changes in the plan and specifications
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5298 - 2017-09-19
Item.” In addition, the building contract stated that “[n]o changes in the plan and specifications
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5298 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Margaret C.
an erroneous exercise of discretion. See Gerald O. v. Cindy R., 203 Wis.2d 148, 152, 551 N.W.2d 855, 857 Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14792 - 2017-09-21
an erroneous exercise of discretion. See Gerald O. v. Cindy R., 203 Wis.2d 148, 152, 551 N.W.2d 855, 857 Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14792 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that [n]o guarantees or promises of any kind, other than those contained herein, have been made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906924 - 2025-01-29
that [n]o guarantees or promises of any kind, other than those contained herein, have been made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906924 - 2025-01-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County: MICHAEL O. BOHREN, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976392 - 2025-07-02
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County: MICHAEL O. BOHREN, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976392 - 2025-07-02
COURT OF APPEALS
. “[S]o long as a sentencing court has considered the proper factors, explained its rationale
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33994 - 2008-09-15
. “[S]o long as a sentencing court has considered the proper factors, explained its rationale
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33994 - 2008-09-15