Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5821 - 5830 of 17132 for probate/1000.
Search results 5821 - 5830 of 17132 for probate/1000.
[PDF]
State v. John R. Martin
, and Martin was ordered to serve five years probation for each charge. The periods of probation were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11311 - 2017-09-19
, and Martin was ordered to serve five years probation for each charge. The periods of probation were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11311 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision, and place LaPointe on probation for three years. The court ultimately departed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654652 - 2023-05-09
of extended supervision, and place LaPointe on probation for three years. The court ultimately departed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654652 - 2023-05-09
State v. Marvin L. T.
eight years imprisonment. The presentence investigation report (PSI) by the Department of Probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14277 - 2005-03-31
eight years imprisonment. The presentence investigation report (PSI) by the Department of Probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14277 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
that they are not). Simonson went to see his probation agent and was arrested in the agent’s office on June 21, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32507 - 2014-09-15
that they are not). Simonson went to see his probation agent and was arrested in the agent’s office on June 21, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32507 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Todd Jerovetz
’ imprisonment. Arguing against Jerovetz’s position that probation should be granted, the prosecutor detailed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5356 - 2017-09-19
’ imprisonment. Arguing against Jerovetz’s position that probation should be granted, the prosecutor detailed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5356 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Ricky L. Thom
and imposed a ten-year term of probation with conditions, including a one-year jail term. Thom contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8783 - 2017-09-19
and imposed a ten-year term of probation with conditions, including a one-year jail term. Thom contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8783 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
support in exchange for a recommendation of three years of probation and sixty days in jail. Id., ¶24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95750 - 2014-09-15
support in exchange for a recommendation of three years of probation and sixty days in jail. Id., ¶24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95750 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
undermine her arguments. 2 Katherine also notes that the court rejected probation in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60274 - 2014-09-15
undermine her arguments. 2 Katherine also notes that the court rejected probation in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60274 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Bell had fifteen prior convictions, and had done poorly on probation. The State also argued
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105288 - 2017-09-21
Bell had fifteen prior convictions, and had done poorly on probation. The State also argued
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105288 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The court withheld sentence and placed Nitchals on probation for three years. After Nitchals’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59565 - 2014-09-15
. The court withheld sentence and placed Nitchals on probation for three years. After Nitchals’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59565 - 2014-09-15