Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5821 - 5830 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Search results 5821 - 5830 of 58547 for speedy trial.
State v. Odell Carter, Jr.
appeals from the judgment of conviction entered following a jury trial, for three counts of first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16067 - 2005-03-31
appeals from the judgment of conviction entered following a jury trial, for three counts of first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16067 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that the trial court erred in waiving juvenile jurisdiction because the evidence before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90004 - 2012-12-03
argues that the trial court erred in waiving juvenile jurisdiction because the evidence before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90004 - 2012-12-03
State v. Frank E. Mallett
because he contends: (1) his Miranda[1] rights were violated; (2) trial counsel failed to request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7304 - 2005-03-31
because he contends: (1) his Miranda[1] rights were violated; (2) trial counsel failed to request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7304 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
to police were coerced and therefore should have been suppressed; (4) the trial court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28568 - 2007-03-26
to police were coerced and therefore should have been suppressed; (4) the trial court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28568 - 2007-03-26
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence H.
an order denying his postconviction motion. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11587 - 2017-09-19
an order denying his postconviction motion. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11587 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Richard A. P.
No. 97-2737-CR 2 additionally appeals from the trial court order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13042 - 2017-09-21
No. 97-2737-CR 2 additionally appeals from the trial court order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13042 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Hope J. Ellsworth v. Mark A. Schelbrock
Corporation and its insurer.1 Schelbrock first contends that the trial court erred by inserting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13580 - 2017-09-21
Corporation and its insurer.1 Schelbrock first contends that the trial court erred by inserting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13580 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
coerced and therefore should have been suppressed; (4) the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28568 - 2014-09-15
coerced and therefore should have been suppressed; (4) the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28568 - 2014-09-15
State v. Lawrence H.
postconviction motion. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective in investigating and presenting a defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11587 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective in investigating and presenting a defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11587 - 2005-03-31
Hope J. Ellsworth v. Mark A. Schelbrock
Corporation and its insurer.[1] Schelbrock first contends that the trial court erred by inserting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13580 - 2005-03-31
Corporation and its insurer.[1] Schelbrock first contends that the trial court erred by inserting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13580 - 2005-03-31