Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 58221 - 58230 of 68290 for law.
Search results 58221 - 58230 of 68290 for law.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a question of law that we consider de novo. State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶16, 331 Wis. 2d 640, 794
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909757 - 2025-02-04
is a question of law that we consider de novo. State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶16, 331 Wis. 2d 640, 794
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909757 - 2025-02-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
character. The resulting sentence was within the potential maximum authorized by law, see State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738968 - 2023-12-13
character. The resulting sentence was within the potential maximum authorized by law, see State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738968 - 2023-12-13
[PDF]
John R. Ammerman v. Adams County Board of Adjustment
on a correct theory of law; (3) whether its action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13123 - 2017-09-21
on a correct theory of law; (3) whether its action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13123 - 2017-09-21
State v. Rodobaldo C. Pozo
, as a matter of law his plea was neither knowing nor voluntary.” In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12275 - 2005-03-31
, as a matter of law his plea was neither knowing nor voluntary.” In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12275 - 2005-03-31
State v. Zenobia W.
only if the trial court failed to apply the pertinent facts to the correct law to reach a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6863 - 2005-03-31
only if the trial court failed to apply the pertinent facts to the correct law to reach a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6863 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
should be corrected is a question of law. State v. Prihoda, 2000 WI 123, ¶8, 239 Wis. 2d 244, 248, 618
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30659 - 2007-10-22
should be corrected is a question of law. State v. Prihoda, 2000 WI 123, ¶8, 239 Wis. 2d 244, 248, 618
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30659 - 2007-10-22
[PDF]
Brown County Human Services Department v. Connie D.
standard of law, and engaged in a rational decision-making process.” Id. at 506-07. ¶5 While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2354 - 2017-09-19
standard of law, and engaged in a rational decision-making process.” Id. at 506-07. ¶5 While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2354 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Douglas County Department of Human Services v. Susan L.
that presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 141 Wis.2d 81, 87, 414 N.W.2d 311
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12882 - 2017-09-21
that presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 141 Wis.2d 81, 87, 414 N.W.2d 311
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12882 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
factor” is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. The defendant must establish the existence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59174 - 2014-09-15
factor” is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. The defendant must establish the existence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59174 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Theodore Blaszkowski v. Thomas Schmitt
of law which we review de novo. See Klinefelter, 161 Wis.2d at 33, 467 N.W.2d at 194. Section 893.25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13960 - 2014-09-15
of law which we review de novo. See Klinefelter, 161 Wis.2d at 33, 467 N.W.2d at 194. Section 893.25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13960 - 2014-09-15