Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 58231 - 58240 of 64561 for b's.
Search results 58231 - 58240 of 64561 for b's.
State v. Jeffry D. Paterson
to § 941.31(2)(b), Stats. The remaining charges were dismissed. However, eight counts of possessing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12755 - 2005-03-31
to § 941.31(2)(b), Stats. The remaining charges were dismissed. However, eight counts of possessing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12755 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
did not prejudice Gant; therefore, the trial court did not err in summarily denying Gant’s motion. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120154 - 2014-08-25
did not prejudice Gant; therefore, the trial court did not err in summarily denying Gant’s motion. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120154 - 2014-08-25
COURT OF APPEALS
809.23(1)(b)5. [1] See State v. Machner, 92 Wis. 2d 797, 285 N.W.2d 905 (Ct. App. 1979). [2] All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119176 - 2014-08-12
809.23(1)(b)5. [1] See State v. Machner, 92 Wis. 2d 797, 285 N.W.2d 905 (Ct. App. 1979). [2] All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119176 - 2014-08-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)4. 2017-09-21T17:23:46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160048 - 2017-09-21
. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)4. 2017-09-21T17:23:46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160048 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1)(b)4. AppealNo AddtlCap Panel2 2014-09-15T18:26:20-0500 CCAP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80692 - 2014-09-15
(1)(b)4. AppealNo AddtlCap Panel2 2014-09-15T18:26:20-0500 CCAP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80692 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5. AppealNo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65190 - 2014-09-15
. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5. AppealNo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65190 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Jami L. Van Boxtel v. Brent F. Van Boxtel
to deviate from the presumptive equal division. See WIS. STAT. § 767.255(3)(b). ¶11 Here, Jami argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15104 - 2017-09-21
to deviate from the presumptive equal division. See WIS. STAT. § 767.255(3)(b). ¶11 Here, Jami argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15104 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87181 - 2014-09-15
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87181 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52935 - 2010-08-02
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52935 - 2010-08-02
State v. Mark W. Roob
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This case is decided by one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4665 - 2005-03-31
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This case is decided by one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4665 - 2005-03-31