Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5831 - 5840 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 5831 - 5840 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
NOTICE
it denied his motion to suppress evidence due to an unlawful arrest. Specifically, Rabuck claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28636 - 2014-09-15
it denied his motion to suppress evidence due to an unlawful arrest. Specifically, Rabuck claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28636 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of a custody classification decision by the Department of Corrections (DOC). Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=296383 - 2020-10-15
of a custody classification decision by the Department of Corrections (DOC). Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=296383 - 2020-10-15
State v. Jermaine M. Webb
that he went to Lake County, Indiana, to interview Webb, a suspect, who was in custody. Webb told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10405 - 2005-03-31
that he went to Lake County, Indiana, to interview Webb, a suspect, who was in custody. Webb told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10405 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John G. Anderson
his motion for a new trial. He argues that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16301 - 2017-09-21
his motion for a new trial. He argues that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16301 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
)(a). He contends the court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence due to an unlawful arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28636 - 2007-04-03
)(a). He contends the court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence due to an unlawful arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28636 - 2007-04-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction for the manufacture/delivery of cocaine, and the order denying his postconviction motion. His
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1038075 - 2025-11-18
of conviction for the manufacture/delivery of cocaine, and the order denying his postconviction motion. His
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1038075 - 2025-11-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction for the manufacture/delivery of cocaine, and the order denying his postconviction motion. His
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1038075 - 2025-11-18
of conviction for the manufacture/delivery of cocaine, and the order denying his postconviction motion. His
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1038075 - 2025-11-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion. Velez argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for advising him not to testify at trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708350 - 2023-10-03
motion. Velez argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for advising him not to testify at trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708350 - 2023-10-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion. Velez argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for advising him not to testify at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708350 - 2023-10-03
motion. Velez argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for advising him not to testify at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708350 - 2023-10-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the trial court erred by denying his motion for appointment of postconviction counsel. We affirm. ΒΆ2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39809 - 2014-09-15
that the trial court erred by denying his motion for appointment of postconviction counsel. We affirm. ΒΆ2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39809 - 2014-09-15