Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5831 - 5840 of 69366 for as he.
Search results 5831 - 5840 of 69366 for as he.
COURT OF APPEALS
. §§ 940.19(6)(a), 943.10(2)(e), and 939.05 (2011-12).[1] He also appeals from orders denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135520 - 2015-03-24
. §§ 940.19(6)(a), 943.10(2)(e), and 939.05 (2011-12).[1] He also appeals from orders denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135520 - 2015-03-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
§§ 940.19(6)(a), 943.10(2)(e), and 939.05 (2011-12). 1 He also appeals from orders denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135520 - 2017-09-21
§§ 940.19(6)(a), 943.10(2)(e), and 939.05 (2011-12). 1 He also appeals from orders denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135520 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Mark W. Roob
).1 He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Roob claims: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6366 - 2017-09-19
).1 He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Roob claims: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6366 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael S. Behnken
-CR 2 term and placed Michael Behnken on probation. He appeals the judgment convicting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3287 - 2017-09-19
-CR 2 term and placed Michael Behnken on probation. He appeals the judgment convicting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3287 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
order denying his motion for a new trial. Edwards claims that he has newly discovered evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378442 - 2021-06-22
order denying his motion for a new trial. Edwards claims that he has newly discovered evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378442 - 2021-06-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
and when during that time period Wagner communicated to Foremost that No. 2009AP650 2 he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43919 - 2014-09-15
and when during that time period Wagner communicated to Foremost that No. 2009AP650 2 he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43919 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael Brandt
refusal to allow him to withdraw his guilty pleas.[1] Brandt contends that he did not understand
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17268 - 2005-03-31
refusal to allow him to withdraw his guilty pleas.[1] Brandt contends that he did not understand
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17268 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dennis P. Smith
), as a third offense. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Smith claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19393 - 2005-08-24
), as a third offense. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Smith claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19393 - 2005-08-24
COURT OF APPEALS
and when during that time period Wagner communicated to Foremost that he did not accept Foremost’s offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43919 - 2009-11-24
and when during that time period Wagner communicated to Foremost that he did not accept Foremost’s offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43919 - 2009-11-24
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James M. DeGracie
be suspended for eight months and that he be ordered to pay the costs of this proceeding which total $586.23
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16664 - 2017-09-21
be suspended for eight months and that he be ordered to pay the costs of this proceeding which total $586.23
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16664 - 2017-09-21