Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5831 - 5840 of 68466 for did.

State v. Jack W. Klubertanz
contends the circuit court erred in deciding it did not have the authority to modify the sentence based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24502 - 2006-04-25

J. Marshall Osborn v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
Osborn’s request, we reverse the order to provide records of applicants who did not enroll and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3175 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jesse Franklin
six-person juries, was constitutional. ¶2 We conclude that the defendants did not receive
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17490 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Tyrone Booker
did not view the video alleged to be "harmful material," but instead heard only the children's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25745 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
six-person juries, was constitutional. ¶2 We conclude that the defendants did not receive
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17515 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 242
that Markwardt said: “I should just have remained silent.” The trial court did not make a factual finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30711 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] J. Marshall Osborn v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
reverse the order to provide records of applicants who did not enroll and affirm the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3175 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
six-person juries, was constitutional. ¶2 We conclude that the defendants did not receive
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17516 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jack W. Klubertanz
to adequately explain the sentence it imposed. Second, he contends the circuit court erred in deciding it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24502 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
six-person juries, was constitutional. ¶2 We conclude that the defendants did not receive
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17517 - 2017-09-21