Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5831 - 5840 of 17242 for probate/1000.
Search results 5831 - 5840 of 17242 for probate/1000.
CA Blank Order
a plea; and (10) successor counsel’s promise that Crump would only need to serve two years of probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102132 - 2013-09-16
a plea; and (10) successor counsel’s promise that Crump would only need to serve two years of probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102132 - 2013-09-16
Alejandro R. Palabrica v.
failure to pursue diligently the probate of an estate in which he served as personal representative
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17294 - 2005-03-31
failure to pursue diligently the probate of an estate in which he served as personal representative
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17294 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on probation for six months. Salituro’s appellate counsel, Stephen M. Compton, has filed a no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157048 - 2017-09-21
on probation for six months. Salituro’s appellate counsel, Stephen M. Compton, has filed a no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157048 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counts of disorderly conduct—all misdemeanors—the State agreed to recommend probation. The circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987090 - 2025-07-22
counts of disorderly conduct—all misdemeanors—the State agreed to recommend probation. The circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987090 - 2025-07-22
State v. Jerod J. Bins
, withheld sentence and placed him on probation for twelve months. Bins did not seek either a direct appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4061 - 2005-03-31
, withheld sentence and placed him on probation for twelve months. Bins did not seek either a direct appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4061 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John R. Martin
, and Martin was ordered to serve five years probation for each charge. The periods of probation were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11308 - 2017-09-19
, and Martin was ordered to serve five years probation for each charge. The periods of probation were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11308 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The court withheld sentence and placed Nitchals on probation for three years. After Nitchals’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59565 - 2014-09-15
. The court withheld sentence and placed Nitchals on probation for three years. After Nitchals’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59565 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. John R. Martin
, and Martin was ordered to serve five years probation for each charge. The periods of probation were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11310 - 2017-09-19
, and Martin was ordered to serve five years probation for each charge. The periods of probation were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11310 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
support in exchange for a recommendation of three years of probation and sixty days in jail. Id., ¶24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95750 - 2014-09-15
support in exchange for a recommendation of three years of probation and sixty days in jail. Id., ¶24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95750 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). 5 We observe that in explaining why probation was not appropriate, the sentencing court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165970 - 2017-09-21
). 5 We observe that in explaining why probation was not appropriate, the sentencing court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165970 - 2017-09-21