Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 58321 - 58330 of 74898 for public records.
Search results 58321 - 58330 of 74898 for public records.
COURT OF APPEALS
motion without a hearing when “the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35558 - 2009-02-17
motion without a hearing when “the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35558 - 2009-02-17
State v. Michelle A.H.
into evidence a tape recording of a telephone message that she left on the answering machine of the foster
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5920 - 2005-03-31
into evidence a tape recording of a telephone message that she left on the answering machine of the foster
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5920 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020254 - 2025-10-07
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020254 - 2025-10-07
[MS WORD]
CR-283: Order Concerning Positive Adjustment Time 973.198
adjustment time. |_| H. the inmate has a poor conduct record in prison. |_| I. the inmate poses
/formdisplay/CR-283.doc?formNumber=CR-283&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2022-06-07
adjustment time. |_| H. the inmate has a poor conduct record in prison. |_| I. the inmate poses
/formdisplay/CR-283.doc?formNumber=CR-283&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2022-06-07
Sid Grinker Company, Inc. v. Rudy Treml
. Stat. § 805.17. This court has reviewed the testimony in the record. The testimony of Michael Grinker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5115 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. § 805.17. This court has reviewed the testimony in the record. The testimony of Michael Grinker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5115 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reconsideration of his motion. Upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=524532 - 2022-05-24
reconsideration of his motion. Upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=524532 - 2022-05-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
report. We conclude that the record belies his new factor claims, and that he waived his due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29859 - 2014-09-15
report. We conclude that the record belies his new factor claims, and that he waived his due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29859 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jon W. Miller
informed that Miller had been located. The record does not indicate when the police were first informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3928 - 2005-03-31
informed that Miller had been located. The record does not indicate when the police were first informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3928 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for a jury to resolve. Based on our review of the record on summary judgment, we agree. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32159 - 2008-03-19
for a jury to resolve. Based on our review of the record on summary judgment, we agree. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32159 - 2008-03-19
County of Bayfield v. Michael Emil Sulla
such a defense at trial. He contends “the record that was developed in the trial court sufficiently raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19243 - 2005-08-08
such a defense at trial. He contends “the record that was developed in the trial court sufficiently raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19243 - 2005-08-08