Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 58341 - 58350 of 83389 for simple case search.
Search results 58341 - 58350 of 83389 for simple case search.
State v. Charles Jones
case pending” in which the judge before whom the case was pending “had specifically ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3374 - 2005-03-31
case pending” in which the judge before whom the case was pending “had specifically ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3374 - 2005-03-31
Anne E. Czarnecki v. Paul A. Czarnecki
to remain on the case; (3) the written order finds that Paul A. Czarnecki used due diligence in general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10281 - 2005-03-31
to remain on the case; (3) the written order finds that Paul A. Czarnecki used due diligence in general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10281 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The case proceeded to a jury trial. Before jury selection was completed, however, the parties reached
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880577 - 2024-11-26
. The case proceeded to a jury trial. Before jury selection was completed, however, the parties reached
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880577 - 2024-11-26
State v. Thomas C. Grohmann
. [COUNSEL]: I can't recall. On misdemeanor cases, Judge, in speaking with the district attorneys, I can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9143 - 2005-03-31
. [COUNSEL]: I can't recall. On misdemeanor cases, Judge, in speaking with the district attorneys, I can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9143 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
The circuit court decision in this case was a certiorari review of the Board’s refusal to hear Jaros’s appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28693 - 2007-04-09
The circuit court decision in this case was a certiorari review of the Board’s refusal to hear Jaros’s appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28693 - 2007-04-09
[PDF]
Steven C. Deiss v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh
established a prima facie case for summary judgment. Id. If so, we review the opposing parties’ proofs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15447 - 2017-09-21
established a prima facie case for summary judgment. Id. If so, we review the opposing parties’ proofs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15447 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kionta L. Crockett
a label [charge] to this case. Is it worthy of something more o[r] some further consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20603 - 2017-09-21
a label [charge] to this case. Is it worthy of something more o[r] some further consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20603 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jackie L. Putskey
, is not the sole determinant of probable cause to arrest. Id. And while no cases exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14156 - 2005-03-31
, is not the sole determinant of probable cause to arrest. Id. And while no cases exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14156 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for sufficient time for Griffin to review the “voluminous” discovery in the case; (2) counsel had not shown him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992795 - 2025-08-05
for sufficient time for Griffin to review the “voluminous” discovery in the case; (2) counsel had not shown him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992795 - 2025-08-05
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 14, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
’ stipulation regarding junk and weeds into a workable order resolving the case. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28045 - 2007-02-13
’ stipulation regarding junk and weeds into a workable order resolving the case. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28045 - 2007-02-13