Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 58371 - 58380 of 62163 for does.
Search results 58371 - 58380 of 62163 for does.
State v. Timothy M. F.
(1998). Timothy acknowledges that the current law does not support his position, but he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7264 - 2005-03-31
(1998). Timothy acknowledges that the current law does not support his position, but he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7264 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tony B. Oliver
not properly represent Oliver’s interests at trial. We determine this does not require reversal. Nothing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5290 - 2005-03-31
not properly represent Oliver’s interests at trial. We determine this does not require reversal. Nothing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5290 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark Anthony Kelley
postconviction motion does not warrant an evidentiary hearing with respect to this allegation because Kelley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12542 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion does not warrant an evidentiary hearing with respect to this allegation because Kelley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12542 - 2005-03-31
Marvin Tomlin v. Langlade County
to stop every time a vehicle approached. Moreover, contrary to the County’s implicit contention, it does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3935 - 2005-03-31
to stop every time a vehicle approached. Moreover, contrary to the County’s implicit contention, it does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3935 - 2005-03-31
State v. Todd R. Gilbertson
separately, but then the cases were consolidated. [2] Despite a postconviction hearing, it does not appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10481 - 2005-03-31
separately, but then the cases were consolidated. [2] Despite a postconviction hearing, it does not appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10481 - 2005-03-31
State v. Todd R. Gilbertson
separately, but then the cases were consolidated. [2] Despite a postconviction hearing, it does not appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10480 - 2005-03-31
separately, but then the cases were consolidated. [2] Despite a postconviction hearing, it does not appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10480 - 2005-03-31
WI App 7 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP36-CR Complete Title of...
the circuit court held the suppression hearing and denied Sutton’s motion. The State, however, does not argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74759 - 2012-01-24
the circuit court held the suppression hearing and denied Sutton’s motion. The State, however, does not argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74759 - 2012-01-24
CA Blank Order
does not otherwise disclose the existence of a “genuine issue as to any material fact regarding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92254 - 2013-02-05
does not otherwise disclose the existence of a “genuine issue as to any material fact regarding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92254 - 2013-02-05
COURT OF APPEALS
who is placed in the back seat of a police vehicle does not know that the back door cannot be opened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76968 - 2012-01-24
who is placed in the back seat of a police vehicle does not know that the back door cannot be opened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76968 - 2012-01-24
COURT OF APPEALS
does not argue that Havlik did not comply with Wis. Stat. § 175.40(2), which authorizes arrests when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93320 - 2013-03-03
does not argue that Havlik did not comply with Wis. Stat. § 175.40(2), which authorizes arrests when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93320 - 2013-03-03