Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 58381 - 58390 of 83455 for simple case search.
Search results 58381 - 58390 of 83455 for simple case search.
State v. Yathzee D. Inman
the novelty of his case, which was, as all parties agreed, the first waiver in Milwaukee County of a child age
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10404 - 2005-03-31
the novelty of his case, which was, as all parties agreed, the first waiver in Milwaukee County of a child age
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10404 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lawrence J. Gegare
facts of this case began with Veeser’s observation of a car containing two young occupants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13563 - 2005-03-31
facts of this case began with Veeser’s observation of a car containing two young occupants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13563 - 2005-03-31
Manor Park Village v. Robin Spoden
the application of the small claims statute, Chapter 799, Stats., to the facts of the case. The application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9750 - 2005-03-31
the application of the small claims statute, Chapter 799, Stats., to the facts of the case. The application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9750 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph S. Barfoot
on hindsight. Rather, the case is reviewed from counsel’s perspective at the time of trial, and the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15713 - 2005-03-31
on hindsight. Rather, the case is reviewed from counsel’s perspective at the time of trial, and the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15713 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
complaint from the Jefferson County case. 2 ¶4 Before the jury trial, the prosecution filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143517 - 2017-09-21
complaint from the Jefferson County case. 2 ¶4 Before the jury trial, the prosecution filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143517 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Frederick F.
, you just don’t disappear. You state your alibi. You find your witnesses, and you make your case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15250 - 2017-09-21
, you just don’t disappear. You state your alibi. You find your witnesses, and you make your case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15250 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
toward his reconfinement term in an unrelated case and that he was not entitled to dual credit because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98716 - 2013-06-26
toward his reconfinement term in an unrelated case and that he was not entitled to dual credit because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98716 - 2013-06-26
State v. Rucker Detective Agency
before me this morning is—doesn’t qualify this case as far as coming within the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12924 - 2005-03-31
before me this morning is—doesn’t qualify this case as far as coming within the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12924 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
at 317. Courts have limited Blum to the scenario where a case was overruled as opposed to reversed. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91376 - 2013-01-09
at 317. Courts have limited Blum to the scenario where a case was overruled as opposed to reversed. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91376 - 2013-01-09
State v. Richard L. Harris
). Perry and DeLeon are not applicable under the facts of this case. Under Perry, a new trial may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10759 - 2005-03-31
). Perry and DeLeon are not applicable under the facts of this case. Under Perry, a new trial may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10759 - 2005-03-31