Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 58391 - 58400 of 83496 for simple case search.
Search results 58391 - 58400 of 83496 for simple case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was inapplicable in this case. Because we agree with the court that the arresting officer had reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=441190 - 2021-10-13
was inapplicable in this case. Because we agree with the court that the arresting officer had reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=441190 - 2021-10-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
entered in 2001. After reviewing the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175699 - 2017-09-21
entered in 2001. After reviewing the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175699 - 2017-09-21
Jessica A. Rusch v. Adam D. Steinke
an order in a civil case). The possibility that counsel may not have expected the trial court to enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20725 - 2005-12-21
an order in a civil case). The possibility that counsel may not have expected the trial court to enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20725 - 2005-12-21
CA Blank Order
’ property. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114855 - 2014-06-16
’ property. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114855 - 2014-06-16
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
No. 2024AP1352 2 that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992351 - 2025-08-06
No. 2024AP1352 2 that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992351 - 2025-08-06
CA Blank Order
to the trial court’s discretion. See Gallion, 270 Wis. 2d 535, ¶41. In this case, the trial court applied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97924 - 2013-06-04
to the trial court’s discretion. See Gallion, 270 Wis. 2d 535, ¶41. In this case, the trial court applied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97924 - 2013-06-04
Bank One v. Breakers Development, Inc.
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9996 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9996 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=710115 - 2023-10-03
motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=710115 - 2023-10-03
State v. Yathzee D. Inman
the novelty of his case, which was, as all parties agreed, the first waiver in Milwaukee County of a child age
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10404 - 2005-03-31
the novelty of his case, which was, as all parties agreed, the first waiver in Milwaukee County of a child age
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10404 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Billy J. Doudna
in this case applied § 346.65(2)(b) (2001-02) in sentencing Doudna and considered his 1992 conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6406 - 2017-09-19
in this case applied § 346.65(2)(b) (2001-02) in sentencing Doudna and considered his 1992 conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6406 - 2017-09-19