Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5841 - 5850 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
Search results 5841 - 5850 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
de novo. See Schwegel v. Milwaukee Cty., 2015 WI 12, ¶18, 360 Wis. 2d 654, 859 N.W.2d 78
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250027 - 2019-11-20
de novo. See Schwegel v. Milwaukee Cty., 2015 WI 12, ¶18, 360 Wis. 2d 654, 859 N.W.2d 78
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250027 - 2019-11-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, he argues it was “necessary for the court to consider and explain as fully as possible why a de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=774911 - 2024-03-13
, he argues it was “necessary for the court to consider and explain as fully as possible why a de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=774911 - 2024-03-13
[PDF]
Village of Fontana v. Lynn M. Zais
questions of law de novo without deference to the trial court. Id. The statute provides, in pertinent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5372 - 2017-09-19
questions of law de novo without deference to the trial court. Id. The statute provides, in pertinent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5372 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the procedural bar imposed by § 974.06 and Escalona- Naranjo is a question of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854735 - 2024-10-01
the procedural bar imposed by § 974.06 and Escalona- Naranjo is a question of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854735 - 2024-10-01
COURT OF APPEALS
App 8, ¶14, 338 Wis. 2d 385, 808 N.W.2d 718 (2011). However, we review de novo the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133096 - 2015-01-20
App 8, ¶14, 338 Wis. 2d 385, 808 N.W.2d 718 (2011). However, we review de novo the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133096 - 2015-01-20
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶14. ¶6 This court resolved Ellis’s appeal from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36480 - 2010-03-31
a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶14. ¶6 This court resolved Ellis’s appeal from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36480 - 2010-03-31
Sunburst IV Limited Partnership v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
on costs. Under Wis. Stat. § 227.485(6) (2001-02),[1] the circuit court has authority to make a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5664 - 2005-03-31
on costs. Under Wis. Stat. § 227.485(6) (2001-02),[1] the circuit court has authority to make a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5664 - 2005-03-31
Daniel Janusz v. Bryan J. Olen
Builders, Ltd., 203 Wis. 2d 341, 345, 553 N.W.2d 281 (Ct. App. 1996). Our review is de novo. See id. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14085 - 2005-03-31
Builders, Ltd., 203 Wis. 2d 341, 345, 553 N.W.2d 281 (Ct. App. 1996). Our review is de novo. See id. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14085 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo, while giving weight to the circuit court decision. State v. Lucas, 2006 WI App 112, ¶23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57878 - 2008-01-29
de novo, while giving weight to the circuit court decision. State v. Lucas, 2006 WI App 112, ¶23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57878 - 2008-01-29
COURT OF APPEALS
the clearly erroneous standard. Id. Second, we apply de novo review to the application of those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73219 - 2011-11-08
the clearly erroneous standard. Id. Second, we apply de novo review to the application of those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73219 - 2011-11-08