Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5841 - 5850 of 50071 for our.

City of Kenosha v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
Barron Elec. Coop. v. PSC, 212 Wis. 2d 752, 760-64, 569 N.W.2d 726 (Ct. App. 1997). Our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15596 - 2005-03-31

State v. Quintin D. L'Minggio
of these factors should have acted to mitigate the sentence. ¶6 Our supreme court has stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3973 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
delinquent property taxes to the City of Milwaukee. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811776 - 2024-06-11

[PDF] State v. Michael P. Stefko
. Despite these warnings he did not retain an attorney. Our independent review of the record convinces us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10098 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246, 257, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728139 - 2023-11-14

State v. Tomas R. Payano-Roman
to suppress. In that context, our review is mixed. We will not overturn any findings of facts made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18072 - 2005-07-06

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Peter T.
are ‘not an element of or relevant to termination under sec. 48.415(2)(c).’” We reject Peter’s contention that our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4563 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] City of Kenosha v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
Barron Elec. Coop. v. PSC, 212 Wis. 2d 752, 760-64, 569 N.W.2d 726 (Ct. App. 1997). Our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15596 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
facts for our review, which neither party challenges, are as follows. No. 2016AP2265 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196506 - 2017-09-21

2010 WI APP 109
by a grievance under the Association’s collective-bargaining agreement with the County. On our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51764 - 2010-08-24