Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 58431 - 58440 of 83414 for simple case search.
Search results 58431 - 58440 of 83414 for simple case search.
State v. Chad D. Everts
that was the case, but if that’s what his social workers were telling him, then that may be the case, that they have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5473 - 2005-03-31
that was the case, but if that’s what his social workers were telling him, then that may be the case, that they have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5473 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
their counterclaims. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149277 - 2017-09-21
their counterclaims. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149277 - 2017-09-21
State v. Paul Sappington
was not negligent in seeking evidence; (3) the evidence is material to an issue in the case; and (4) the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16200 - 2005-03-31
was not negligent in seeking evidence; (3) the evidence is material to an issue in the case; and (4) the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16200 - 2005-03-31
Town of Hallie v. City of Eau Claire
of an annexation under Wis. Stat. § 66.021(2) and is thus inapplicable to the present case. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2984 - 2005-03-31
of an annexation under Wis. Stat. § 66.021(2) and is thus inapplicable to the present case. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2984 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jessica A. Rusch v. Adam D. Steinke
§ 808.04(1) (allowing 90 days to appeal from an order in a civil case). The possibility that counsel may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20725 - 2017-09-21
§ 808.04(1) (allowing 90 days to appeal from an order in a civil case). The possibility that counsel may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20725 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an “acknowledgement … that you understand what is happening in the case.” It concluded that his plea was knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181411 - 2017-09-21
an “acknowledgement … that you understand what is happening in the case.” It concluded that his plea was knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181411 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989608 - 2025-07-30
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989608 - 2025-07-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 2d 166, 190, 560 N.W.2d 246 (1997). In this case, the question that Alexander presents is answered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074426 - 2026-02-10
. 2d 166, 190, 560 N.W.2d 246 (1997). In this case, the question that Alexander presents is answered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074426 - 2026-02-10
[PDF]
State v. Rayfe J. Paulick
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3410 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11760 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3410 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11760 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to resolve his case through a plea agreement. In exchange for his guilty plea to first-degree reckless
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245611 - 2019-08-22
to resolve his case through a plea agreement. In exchange for his guilty plea to first-degree reckless
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245611 - 2019-08-22