Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 58431 - 58440 of 83882 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 58431 - 58440 of 83882 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
argument is that this is not a maintenance case. Indeed, the parties agreed that by entering the Section
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96620 - 2014-09-15
argument is that this is not a maintenance case. Indeed, the parties agreed that by entering the Section
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96620 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
David Fanello, Sr. v. Ralph Weisenberger
to the governmental immunity doctrine, two of which are argued in this case. The No. 01-2999 3 County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4573 - 2017-09-19
to the governmental immunity doctrine, two of which are argued in this case. The No. 01-2999 3 County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4573 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Robert Keith v. Joshuah C. Harner
concluded that it lacked jurisdiction over the case because Keith had not No. 04-0284 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7274 - 2017-09-20
concluded that it lacked jurisdiction over the case because Keith had not No. 04-0284 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7274 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). In these consolidated cases, Julian J. Miller appeals pro se from orders denying his motions for relief. He
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=496104 - 2022-03-23
). In these consolidated cases, Julian J. Miller appeals pro se from orders denying his motions for relief. He
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=496104 - 2022-03-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, consecutive. The no-merit report provides a thorough analysis of the criminal proceedings in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726922 - 2023-11-15
, consecutive. The no-merit report provides a thorough analysis of the criminal proceedings in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726922 - 2023-11-15
State v. Michael D. Thompson
that he had not validly waived his right to counsel in that case. We agree, and therefore reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7326 - 2005-03-31
that he had not validly waived his right to counsel in that case. We agree, and therefore reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7326 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133571 - 2015-01-27
on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133571 - 2015-01-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
but nevertheless determined a six-person jury would hear the case. After an evidentiary hearing, the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120185 - 2014-09-15
but nevertheless determined a six-person jury would hear the case. After an evidentiary hearing, the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120185 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94400 - 2014-09-15
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94400 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel was constitutionally ineffective by failing to seek a dismissal of the case and by failing to move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75152 - 2011-12-12
counsel was constitutionally ineffective by failing to seek a dismissal of the case and by failing to move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75152 - 2011-12-12