Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 58471 - 58480 of 83395 for simple case search.
Search results 58471 - 58480 of 83395 for simple case search.
[PDF]
State v. Richard L. Harris
, 377 N.W.2d 635 (Ct. App. 1985). Perry and DeLeon are not applicable under the facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12490 - 2017-09-21
, 377 N.W.2d 635 (Ct. App. 1985). Perry and DeLeon are not applicable under the facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12490 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Kane
in a Milwaukee county case which No. 99-0313-CR 6 rendered the Alford plea agreement less
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15092 - 2017-09-21
in a Milwaukee county case which No. 99-0313-CR 6 rendered the Alford plea agreement less
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15092 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
it. As to his claim for sentence credit, Simpson received three consecutive sentences in this case, and he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362038 - 2021-05-04
it. As to his claim for sentence credit, Simpson received three consecutive sentences in this case, and he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362038 - 2021-05-04
State v. Ryan E. Brockman
of Optometry. He had testified as an expert on HGN testing in two other cases. Since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9287 - 2005-03-31
of Optometry. He had testified as an expert on HGN testing in two other cases. Since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9287 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ryan E. Brockman
of Optometry. He had testified as an expert on HGN testing in two other cases. Since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9285 - 2005-03-31
of Optometry. He had testified as an expert on HGN testing in two other cases. Since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9285 - 2005-03-31
2006 WI APP 240
2006 WI App 240 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP265 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26839 - 2006-11-20
2006 WI App 240 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP265 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26839 - 2006-11-20
COURT OF APPEALS
as a controlled substance under Schedule II. Wis. Stat. § 961.16(5). Thus, to prove its case, the State had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65432 - 2011-06-08
as a controlled substance under Schedule II. Wis. Stat. § 961.16(5). Thus, to prove its case, the State had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65432 - 2011-06-08
COURT OF APPEALS
In this case, the circuit court concluded the term stating that no “pre-fab, manufactured, or trailer-type
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28594 - 2007-03-26
In this case, the circuit court concluded the term stating that no “pre-fab, manufactured, or trailer-type
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28594 - 2007-03-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
]ovement within a lane is not unusual.” However, Sergeant Gonzalez testified that in this case, where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78849 - 2014-09-15
]ovement within a lane is not unusual.” However, Sergeant Gonzalez testified that in this case, where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78849 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Mylea Wirkus
to a prior arrest for OWI, complaining that the officer in that case had made her wait for approximately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21671 - 2017-09-21
to a prior arrest for OWI, complaining that the officer in that case had made her wait for approximately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21671 - 2017-09-21