Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 58491 - 58500 of 61723 for judgment.
Search results 58491 - 58500 of 61723 for judgment.
[PDF]
State v. Peter Jay Bartram
)(a) (1997-98), the State is permitted to appeal any “[f]inal order or judgment adverse to the [S]tate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15790 - 2017-09-21
)(a) (1997-98), the State is permitted to appeal any “[f]inal order or judgment adverse to the [S]tate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15790 - 2017-09-21
State v. Conrad Hagenkord
beyond a reasonable doubt. First, a certified copy of Hagenkord’s judgment of conviction for first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12256 - 2005-03-31
beyond a reasonable doubt. First, a certified copy of Hagenkord’s judgment of conviction for first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12256 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of Wisconsin moved for partial summary judgment on both of the petitioned grounds. The circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251806 - 2019-12-27
of Wisconsin moved for partial summary judgment on both of the petitioned grounds. The circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251806 - 2019-12-27
COURT OF APPEALS
is genuinely ambiguous, such that overturning the officer’s judgment requires hard interpretive work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145690 - 2015-08-03
is genuinely ambiguous, such that overturning the officer’s judgment requires hard interpretive work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145690 - 2015-08-03
COURT OF APPEALS
foreclosure judgments against the Hoppas. ¶5 After confirmation of the sheriff’s sale, Tri City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89261 - 2012-11-13
foreclosure judgments against the Hoppas. ¶5 After confirmation of the sheriff’s sale, Tri City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89261 - 2012-11-13
State v. Peter Jay Bartram
is permitted to appeal any “[f]inal order or judgment adverse to the [S]tate … if the appeal would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15790 - 2005-03-31
is permitted to appeal any “[f]inal order or judgment adverse to the [S]tate … if the appeal would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15790 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
applies when an issue of fact is actually litigated and the determination is essential to the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132741 - 2015-01-12
applies when an issue of fact is actually litigated and the determination is essential to the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132741 - 2015-01-12
State v. Joseph W.D., Sr.
. As a result, the State moved the trial court to enter default judgment for Joseph’s noncompliance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3568 - 2005-03-31
. As a result, the State moved the trial court to enter default judgment for Joseph’s noncompliance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3568 - 2005-03-31
Blue Mound Golf and Country Club v. Municipal Well & Pump, Inc.
for declaratory judgment contending that their policies provided no coverage for breach of contract claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2664 - 2005-03-31
for declaratory judgment contending that their policies provided no coverage for breach of contract claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2664 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the judgments of conviction. ¶6 In August 2000, Gaustad’s probation was revoked, and out of a maximum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52099 - 2010-07-14
the judgments of conviction. ¶6 In August 2000, Gaustad’s probation was revoked, and out of a maximum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52099 - 2010-07-14