Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5851 - 5860 of 29942 for des.
Search results 5851 - 5860 of 29942 for des.
Mary V. Skolaski v. Craig Frank
requested a trial de novo pursuant to § 799.207(3), Stats. The trial court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12864 - 2005-03-31
requested a trial de novo pursuant to § 799.207(3), Stats. The trial court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12864 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shawn Riley
that this court also reviews de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. 1. Alford
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2378 - 2005-03-31
that this court also reviews de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. 1. Alford
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2378 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a defendant to relief is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. The circuit court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239343 - 2019-04-23
a defendant to relief is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. The circuit court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239343 - 2019-04-23
Katherine Kaatz v. Tommy E. Hamilton
the doctrine of claim preclusion applies under a given set of facts is a question of law we must review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10335 - 2005-03-31
the doctrine of claim preclusion applies under a given set of facts is a question of law we must review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10335 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Bobbie Gohde v. MSI Insurance Company
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4268 - 2017-09-19
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4268 - 2017-09-19
Joseph Mullen v. Douglas J. Walczak
, 2002. STANDARDS OF REVIEW ¶11 A grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo using the same
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16584 - 2005-03-31
, 2002. STANDARDS OF REVIEW ¶11 A grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo using the same
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16584 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
designation.” (Emphasis added). ¶10 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140358 - 2017-09-21
designation.” (Emphasis added). ¶10 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140358 - 2017-09-21
Factory Mutual Ins. Co. v. Citizens Insurance Co. of America
of Citizens. Factory Mutual appeals. DISCUSSION ¶10 We review summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20609 - 2006-01-24
of Citizens. Factory Mutual appeals. DISCUSSION ¶10 We review summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20609 - 2006-01-24
Jami L. Van Boxtel v. Brent F. Van Boxtel
and CROSS-APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15104 - 2005-03-31
and CROSS-APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15104 - 2005-03-31
State v. William L. Brockett
the State’s motion for reconsideration is a question of statutory construction which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3960 - 2005-03-31
the State’s motion for reconsideration is a question of statutory construction which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3960 - 2005-03-31