Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5851 - 5860 of 17457 for ex.
Search results 5851 - 5860 of 17457 for ex.
COURT OF APPEALS
obtaining an education in that district. State ex rel. School District No. 1 of Waukesha v. Thayer, 74 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31951 - 2008-02-27
obtaining an education in that district. State ex rel. School District No. 1 of Waukesha v. Thayer, 74 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31951 - 2008-02-27
COURT OF APPEALS
rejected in his second Knight petition. See State ex rel. Ellis v. Dittman, No. 2010AP1055-W, unpublished
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92348 - 2013-02-04
rejected in his second Knight petition. See State ex rel. Ellis v. Dittman, No. 2010AP1055-W, unpublished
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92348 - 2013-02-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
contends that applying the mandatory statute to him represented an ex post facto violation. However
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162286 - 2017-09-21
contends that applying the mandatory statute to him represented an ex post facto violation. However
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162286 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of postconviction counsel may constitute sufficient reason for not raising an issue. See State ex rel. Rothering
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232871 - 2019-01-14
of postconviction counsel may constitute sufficient reason for not raising an issue. See State ex rel. Rothering
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232871 - 2019-01-14
Dolores Haas v. Thomas J. Berube
its discretion. See State ex rel. Cynthia M.S. v. Michael F.C., 181 Wis. 2d 618, 624, 511 N.W.2d 868
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2262 - 2005-03-31
its discretion. See State ex rel. Cynthia M.S. v. Michael F.C., 181 Wis. 2d 618, 624, 511 N.W.2d 868
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2262 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, unless there was inadvertence, fraud, or a void judgment. See State ex rel. Fuentes v. Wisconsin Ct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654106 - 2023-05-11
, unless there was inadvertence, fraud, or a void judgment. See State ex rel. Fuentes v. Wisconsin Ct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654106 - 2023-05-11
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
(1967); WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2011-12);1 State ex rel. McCoy v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals, 137 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97723 - 2014-09-15
(1967); WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2011-12);1 State ex rel. McCoy v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals, 137 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97723 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the probation revocation is also not the subject of such an appeal. See State ex rel. Flowers v. DHSS, 81 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251216 - 2019-12-10
of the probation revocation is also not the subject of such an appeal. See State ex rel. Flowers v. DHSS, 81 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251216 - 2019-12-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the underlying controversy); State ex rel. Jones v. Gerhardstein, 135 Wis. 2d 161, 169, 400 N.W.2d 1 (Ct. App
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208823 - 2018-02-28
the underlying controversy); State ex rel. Jones v. Gerhardstein, 135 Wis. 2d 161, 169, 400 N.W.2d 1 (Ct. App
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208823 - 2018-02-28
COURT OF APPEALS
State of Wisconsin ex rel. Lawrence Ross, Petitioner-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29965 - 2007-08-13
State of Wisconsin ex rel. Lawrence Ross, Petitioner-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29965 - 2007-08-13