Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 58511 - 58520 of 63224 for records.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
at Regan’s property. We reject this argument because the Record demonstrates that trial counsel adequately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027935 - 2025-10-29

[PDF] Lawson Bender v. Karmen Lindhal
will. 6 The transfer tax return stated that the transfer was a "reformation of prior recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8396 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, with appropriate references to the record.” (Emphasis added.) The statement of the case in Baker’s principal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97503 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Mary J. Pietrowski v. Richard G. Dufrane
2 We do note that the record indicates the Dufranes simply used the garage to store personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2898 - 2017-09-19

State v. Keith M. Carey
and the person’s attorney of record in the prior criminal proceeding at least 14 days prior to transferring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6584 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jimmy Lee Hensley
facts of record). Consistent with Strickland, in any challenge to trial counsel's effectiveness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9812 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Margaret R. Cierzan v. Jessica Kriegel
did. While we acknowledge Kriegel set rules, there is nothing in the record to demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5227 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Thomas W. Jackson
and the orders. Facts and Procedural History ¶2 Jackson’s criminal record and history of confinement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15467 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. The respondents [Shepherd and Greenfield] are not parties to this case, nor are they counsel of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139585 - 2015-04-13

State v. Norman R.
noted that Mrs. R. was filthy upon her admission to the hospital, there was no record of any prenatal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5323 - 2005-03-31