Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 58541 - 58550 of 83414 for simple case search.
Search results 58541 - 58550 of 83414 for simple case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was taken from A.G.’s case manager, K.K. The circuit court found that T.E.-P. was unfit, and the matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449537 - 2021-11-09
was taken from A.G.’s case manager, K.K. The circuit court found that T.E.-P. was unfit, and the matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449537 - 2021-11-09
State v. Rucker Detective Agency
before me this morning is—doesn’t qualify this case as far as coming within the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12924 - 2005-03-31
before me this morning is—doesn’t qualify this case as far as coming within the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12924 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case by assuming the truth of disputed facts. Here, the court relied on the revocation summary, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57826 - 2010-12-13
in this case by assuming the truth of disputed facts. Here, the court relied on the revocation summary, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57826 - 2010-12-13
Christine A. Rotheray v. Timothy D. Wilson
in this case, however, explaining that it was “setting child support as the law was effective in October
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17934 - 2005-04-27
in this case, however, explaining that it was “setting child support as the law was effective in October
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17934 - 2005-04-27
State v. Ryan E. Brockman
of Optometry. He had testified as an expert on HGN testing in two other cases. Since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9283 - 2005-03-31
of Optometry. He had testified as an expert on HGN testing in two other cases. Since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9283 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charles G. Campbell
. State, 86 Wis. 2d 51, 271 N.W.2d 610 (1978), as well as other cases relying on Wolverton and Powell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7257 - 2005-03-31
. State, 86 Wis. 2d 51, 271 N.W.2d 610 (1978), as well as other cases relying on Wolverton and Powell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7257 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for missing the stop sign. We disagree. Wisconsin case law acknowledges that a motorist may be charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92478 - 2013-02-04
for missing the stop sign. We disagree. Wisconsin case law acknowledges that a motorist may be charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92478 - 2013-02-04
COURT OF APPEALS
) whether the evidence is material to a fact at issue in the case; and (3) whether the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53163 - 2010-08-09
) whether the evidence is material to a fact at issue in the case; and (3) whether the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53163 - 2010-08-09
COURT OF APPEALS
to an in camera review of documents withheld during discovery. This is not a case involving confidential records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58602 - 2011-12-19
to an in camera review of documents withheld during discovery. This is not a case involving confidential records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58602 - 2011-12-19
State v. Booker T. Shipp
was prejudicial to defendant’s case, in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment[s] to the United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12868 - 2005-03-31
was prejudicial to defendant’s case, in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment[s] to the United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12868 - 2005-03-31