Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5861 - 5870 of 98499 for court records search online.
Search results 5861 - 5870 of 98499 for court records search online.
[PDF]
State v. Scott Kiekhefer
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2052-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11123 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2052-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11123 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
counsel] can satisfy the court that these documents properly belong in the record, a request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30294 - 2014-09-15
counsel] can satisfy the court that these documents properly belong in the record, a request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30294 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
” and/or “unmistakable” odor of marijuana to establish probable cause to search a vehicle. The court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804505 - 2024-05-22
” and/or “unmistakable” odor of marijuana to establish probable cause to search a vehicle. The court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804505 - 2024-05-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
” and/or “unmistakable” odor of marijuana to establish probable cause to search a vehicle. The court stated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804505 - 2024-05-22
” and/or “unmistakable” odor of marijuana to establish probable cause to search a vehicle. The court stated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804505 - 2024-05-22
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 9, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34788 - 2008-12-08
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 9, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34788 - 2008-12-08
COURT OF APPEALS
for the same reasons set forth by the trial court on the record. There was no evidence of any bad faith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32972 - 2008-06-09
for the same reasons set forth by the trial court on the record. There was no evidence of any bad faith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32972 - 2008-06-09
State v. James Welch
, that is implicit in the court’s decision, and this implicit finding is supported by the record. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5123 - 2005-03-31
, that is implicit in the court’s decision, and this implicit finding is supported by the record. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5123 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
providing records” to Socha, “justifying dismissal.” Socha now appeals the court’s denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370546 - 2021-05-25
providing records” to Socha, “justifying dismissal.” Socha now appeals the court’s denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370546 - 2021-05-25
[PDF]
because it was consensual. The circuit court determined that the search was lawful based on Timm’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752844 - 2024-01-19
because it was consensual. The circuit court determined that the search was lawful based on Timm’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752844 - 2024-01-19
[PDF]
Orville Oney v. Leroy Nennig, Jr.
court's decision. Id. We examine the record to determine whether any genuine issues of material fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8220 - 2017-09-19
court's decision. Id. We examine the record to determine whether any genuine issues of material fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8220 - 2017-09-19