Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5871 - 5880 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 5871 - 5880 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
Malcolm H. v. Marc J. Ackerman
CURIAM. Malcolm H. appeals from a summary judgment granting Marc J. Ackerman’s motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11441 - 2005-03-31
CURIAM. Malcolm H. appeals from a summary judgment granting Marc J. Ackerman’s motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11441 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
attempt to take a person into custody and one count of misdemeanor disorderly conduct, domestic abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110500 - 2014-04-21
attempt to take a person into custody and one count of misdemeanor disorderly conduct, domestic abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110500 - 2014-04-21
Frontsheet
).[3] The court of appeals held that the circuit court erred in denying Purtell's motion to suppress
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118829 - 2014-07-31
).[3] The court of appeals held that the circuit court erred in denying Purtell's motion to suppress
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118829 - 2014-07-31
[PDF]
Robert G. Fish v. Margaret W. Fish
were divorced in 1979. The divorce judgment granted custody of the parties' two minor children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8082 - 2017-09-19
were divorced in 1979. The divorce judgment granted custody of the parties' two minor children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8082 - 2017-09-19
Robert G. Fish v. Margaret W. Fish
divorced in 1979. The divorce judgment granted custody of the parties' two minor children to Margaret
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8082 - 2005-03-31
divorced in 1979. The divorce judgment granted custody of the parties' two minor children to Margaret
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8082 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Minute-taking standards
OR Unmonitored DAR (if no court reporter) • Any jail sanctions given • Motions for termination from
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/minutetakingstandards.pdf - 2025-10-22
OR Unmonitored DAR (if no court reporter) • Any jail sanctions given • Motions for termination from
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/minutetakingstandards.pdf - 2025-10-22
[PDF]
COURT MINUTE-TAKING STANDARDS – Treatment courts
• Motions for termination from treatment court • Court’s ruling regarding termination • Next appearance
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/minutetakingstandardstreatment.pdf - 2025-12-01
• Motions for termination from treatment court • Court’s ruling regarding termination • Next appearance
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/minutetakingstandardstreatment.pdf - 2025-12-01
[PDF]
WI App 65
. The circuit court used the time stamps from the body camera in its decision granting the motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=413131 - 2021-10-12
. The circuit court used the time stamps from the body camera in its decision granting the motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=413131 - 2021-10-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his no contest plea. His appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202170 - 2017-11-15
appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his no contest plea. His appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202170 - 2017-11-15
[PDF]
WI App 18
) the circuit court did not “have authority” to hear the State’s motion to lift the automatic stay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=339995 - 2021-04-19
) the circuit court did not “have authority” to hear the State’s motion to lift the automatic stay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=339995 - 2021-04-19