Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 58701 - 58710 of 68339 for law.

[PDF] State v. Robert J. Barnes
” for sentencing purposes presents a question of law which we review without deference to the trial court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13395 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and Reyes’s character. The resulting sentence was within the potential maximum authorized by law, see State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=781130 - 2024-04-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of no such right. No. 2018AP1088-FT 5 violated is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222026 - 2018-10-17

[PDF] CA Blank Order
character. The resulting sentence was within the potential maximum authorized by law, see State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738968 - 2023-12-13

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Rd. Milwaukee, WI 53226 Carl W. Chesshir Chesshir Law Office S101 W34417 Hwy LO, Ste. B
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203545 - 2017-11-21

[PDF] State v. Zong Lor
assistance of counsel present mixed questions of law and fact. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 698
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3124 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
choices made after thorough investigation of the law and facts are virtually unchallengeable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32629 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to determine whether the complaint states a claim and the answer joins an issue of fact or law. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82287 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
23600 Green Bay, WI 54305-3600 Ralph Sczygelski Sczygelski & Pangburn Law Firm, LLC 713
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117693 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
). Whether Tillman’s procedural bar applies is a question of law entitled to independent review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35937 - 2014-09-15