Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 58701 - 58710 of 83389 for simple case search.
Search results 58701 - 58710 of 83389 for simple case search.
Douglas Goeb v.
Case No.: 96-0605-D Complete
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17096 - 2005-03-31
Case No.: 96-0605-D Complete
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17096 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of the case. David was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon consideration
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132066 - 2014-12-18
of the case. David was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon consideration
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132066 - 2014-12-18
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, an operating after revocation charge in a Wood County case was dismissed and read in. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96657 - 2014-09-15
, an operating after revocation charge in a Wood County case was dismissed and read in. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96657 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Nathaniel A. Lindell
claims in a case with which it is already familiar. Second, the order denying Lindell’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5211 - 2017-09-19
claims in a case with which it is already familiar. Second, the order denying Lindell’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5211 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
ability to manage its docket based on the circumstances of the case. The court concluded that § 813.126
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132787 - 2015-01-13
ability to manage its docket based on the circumstances of the case. The court concluded that § 813.126
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132787 - 2015-01-13
State v. Judy A. Garbow Swanson
, 451 N.W.2d 752 (1990). Swanson’s case was tried before a jury, and this court concludes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25213 - 2006-05-22
, 451 N.W.2d 752 (1990). Swanson’s case was tried before a jury, and this court concludes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25213 - 2006-05-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252929 - 2020-01-29
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252929 - 2020-01-29
COURT OF APPEALS
stop.[2] He claims that his case is just the scenario identified by the Post court. We hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61344 - 2011-03-22
stop.[2] He claims that his case is just the scenario identified by the Post court. We hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61344 - 2011-03-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390390 - 2021-07-15
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390390 - 2021-07-15
[PDF]
State v. Colleen B. Dunn
This case is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (1997-98). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15536 - 2017-09-21
This case is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (1997-98). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15536 - 2017-09-21