Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 58721 - 58730 of 61723 for judgment.
Search results 58721 - 58730 of 61723 for judgment.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
affected the substantial rights of the party seeking to reverse or set aside the judgment, or to secure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479309 - 2022-01-28
affected the substantial rights of the party seeking to reverse or set aside the judgment, or to secure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479309 - 2022-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS
at the commitment hearing by introduction of a judgment of conviction, a conclusive judicial record. Shepard v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42109 - 2009-10-13
at the commitment hearing by introduction of a judgment of conviction, a conclusive judicial record. Shepard v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42109 - 2009-10-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on a declaratory judgment claim) as to whether the arbitration had been based on statutory or common law. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=523171 - 2022-05-19
on a declaratory judgment claim) as to whether the arbitration had been based on statutory or common law. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=523171 - 2022-05-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will rather than its judgment; (4) and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800811 - 2024-05-14
arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will rather than its judgment; (4) and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800811 - 2024-05-14
[PDF]
George B. Furey, Jr. v. Clarine A. Furey
, and divorced in 2004. They have two sons. The March 29, 2004 judgment of divorce was based on a marital
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21169 - 2017-09-21
, and divorced in 2004. They have two sons. The March 29, 2004 judgment of divorce was based on a marital
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21169 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
) and 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6), and for a judgment in the amount of $678,900.87 "representing treble damages
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=308116 - 2020-11-24
) and 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6), and for a judgment in the amount of $678,900.87 "representing treble damages
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=308116 - 2020-11-24
[PDF]
State v. John A. Jipson
of the judgment has been declared, there is no need to discuss the others urged.”). No. 03-0866-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6335 - 2017-09-19
of the judgment has been declared, there is no need to discuss the others urged.”). No. 03-0866-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6335 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Mary Ellyn Doerr v. Charles A. Doerr
, Reed, and Georgia. The divorce judgment awarded sole legal custody and primary physical placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10132 - 2017-09-19
, Reed, and Georgia. The divorce judgment awarded sole legal custody and primary physical placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10132 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was constitutionally valid. Seward has not, in our judgment, made a prima facie case. Therefore, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186540 - 2017-09-21
was constitutionally valid. Seward has not, in our judgment, made a prima facie case. Therefore, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186540 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Hollenbeck’s arguments and affirmed the judgment and order. See State v. Hollenbeck, No. 2012AP2254-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161245 - 2017-09-21
Hollenbeck’s arguments and affirmed the judgment and order. See State v. Hollenbeck, No. 2012AP2254-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161245 - 2017-09-21