Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 58741 - 58750 of 68339 for law.
Search results 58741 - 58750 of 68339 for law.
State v. John L. Griffin
acceptance of any plea…. The trial court denied the motion, discussing the applicable law—which we also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11542 - 2005-03-31
acceptance of any plea…. The trial court denied the motion, discussing the applicable law—which we also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11542 - 2005-03-31
Mark N. Stach v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
activities on June 24, 1993. The administrative law judge (ALJ) ruled against Stach, finding Dr. Kokemoor’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11405 - 2005-03-31
activities on June 24, 1993. The administrative law judge (ALJ) ruled against Stach, finding Dr. Kokemoor’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11405 - 2005-03-31
March 2006 Table of Unpublished Opinions
judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case. Docket No. Title
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24737 - 2006-04-04
judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case. Docket No. Title
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24737 - 2006-04-04
COURT OF APPEALS
-perfect example of findings of fact and conclusions of law, the record sufficiently supports the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57031 - 2010-11-22
-perfect example of findings of fact and conclusions of law, the record sufficiently supports the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57031 - 2010-11-22
Jeannine M.C. v. Michael A.C.
of that statute. The construction and application of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9979 - 2005-03-31
of that statute. The construction and application of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9979 - 2005-03-31
James L. Koskey v. The Town of Bergen
and application of a statute to undisputed facts, a question of law we review without deference to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15899 - 2005-03-31
and application of a statute to undisputed facts, a question of law we review without deference to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15899 - 2005-03-31
Walters Family Trust v. Scott Walters
applied the wrong standard of law in determining his father’s competency at the time of the amendment’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6704 - 2005-03-31
applied the wrong standard of law in determining his father’s competency at the time of the amendment’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6704 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel Fredrick Cadotte
court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous and independently apply the law to those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7209 - 2005-03-31
court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous and independently apply the law to those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7209 - 2005-03-31
Rusk County v. Harold S., Sr.
, to not exercise visitation rights, then the Department, as I understand the statute and the law, can come back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20840 - 2010-10-24
, to not exercise visitation rights, then the Department, as I understand the statute and the law, can come back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20840 - 2010-10-24
Eugene I. Smith v. M & I Investment Management Corp.
court erred as a matter of law in excluding the evidence because it was properly admissible as a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8473 - 2005-10-30
court erred as a matter of law in excluding the evidence because it was properly admissible as a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8473 - 2005-10-30