Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5881 - 5890 of 82984 for case codes/1000.
Search results 5881 - 5890 of 82984 for case codes/1000.
CA Blank Order
. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102564 - 2013-09-30
. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102564 - 2013-09-30
[PDF]
State v. James P.F.
a sentence on another case. On October 5, 1996, James completed that sentence. The Barron County jailer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12873 - 2017-09-21
a sentence on another case. On October 5, 1996, James completed that sentence. The Barron County jailer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12873 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Richard N. Nickl v. John Husz
in this case by informing Nickl that he had not served sufficient time for punishment due to the “enormity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13139 - 2017-09-21
in this case by informing Nickl that he had not served sufficient time for punishment due to the “enormity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13139 - 2017-09-21
State v. William W. Gandt
a case that discusses public policy concerns based on the administrative code regarding employment issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10434 - 2005-03-31
a case that discusses public policy concerns based on the administrative code regarding employment issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10434 - 2005-03-31
City of Wautoma v. David H. Jansen
of the Wautoma city ordinances. He argues that: (1) his case was illegally tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9249 - 2005-03-31
of the Wautoma city ordinances. He argues that: (1) his case was illegally tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9249 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Wautoma v. David H. Jansen
ordinances. He argues that: (1) his case was illegally tried to a jury; (2) he was denied due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9249 - 2017-09-19
ordinances. He argues that: (1) his case was illegally tried to a jury; (2) he was denied due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9249 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
court for Waukesha County: KATHRYN W. FOSTER, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 BROWN, C.J.1 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30622 - 2014-09-15
court for Waukesha County: KATHRYN W. FOSTER, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 BROWN, C.J.1 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30622 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Nathaniel Allen Lindell v. Jon E. Litscher
by WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 303.76(1). The respondents claim Lindell was given a form, known as DOC-71
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6556 - 2017-09-19
by WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 303.76(1). The respondents claim Lindell was given a form, known as DOC-71
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6556 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. William W. Gandt
proposition. He cites instead a case that discusses public policy concerns based on the administrative code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10434 - 2017-09-20
proposition. He cites instead a case that discusses public policy concerns based on the administrative code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10434 - 2017-09-20
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
justices Calendar Livestream courts Famous cases Visiting Court of Appeals Function Fees & filing Judges
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=986&year=2018
justices Calendar Livestream courts Famous cases Visiting Court of Appeals Function Fees & filing Judges
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=986&year=2018