Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5881 - 5890 of 83278 for case search.
Search results 5881 - 5890 of 83278 for case search.
State v. Carlton S. C.-B.
. This court concludes that the police's search and eventual seizure of cocaine was proper under the “plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9526 - 2005-03-31
. This court concludes that the police's search and eventual seizure of cocaine was proper under the “plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9526 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
performed a pat–down search of both men for weapons. Burger patted down Harris. Burger told Jenkins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35197 - 2009-01-12
performed a pat–down search of both men for weapons. Burger patted down Harris. Burger told Jenkins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35197 - 2009-01-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
testified that the officers performed a pat–down search of both men for weapons. Burger patted down
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35197 - 2014-09-15
testified that the officers performed a pat–down search of both men for weapons. Burger patted down
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35197 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. § 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341067 - 2021-03-02
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. § 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341067 - 2021-03-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is whether the facts of the case would warrant a reasonable police officer, in light of his or her training
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244810 - 2019-08-06
is whether the facts of the case would warrant a reasonable police officer, in light of his or her training
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244810 - 2019-08-06
State v. Jacob W. Hatcher
and, accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgment and order. Background ¶2 The facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5746 - 2005-03-31
and, accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgment and order. Background ¶2 The facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5746 - 2005-03-31
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=49&year=2007
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=49&year=2007
Wisconsin Court System - For attorneys - Pro hac vice admission
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/services/attorney/prohacvice.htm - 2026-02-22
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/services/attorney/prohacvice.htm - 2026-02-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-CR 2 conclusion that the officer who filed the affidavit in support of a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=850895 - 2024-09-18
-CR 2 conclusion that the officer who filed the affidavit in support of a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=850895 - 2024-09-18
COURT OF APPEALS
pursuant to a search warrant and when it denied his motion for a hearing pursuant to Franks v. Delaware
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53539 - 2010-08-23
pursuant to a search warrant and when it denied his motion for a hearing pursuant to Franks v. Delaware
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53539 - 2010-08-23