Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 58801 - 58810 of 61723 for judgment.
Search results 58801 - 58810 of 61723 for judgment.
William Keen v. Dane County Board of Supervisors
or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) whether the evidence was such that it might
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6284 - 2005-03-31
or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) whether the evidence was such that it might
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6284 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Dona J. Fabyan v. Waukesha County Board of Adjustment
its will and not its judgment; and (4) whether the board might reasonably make the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3276 - 2017-09-19
its will and not its judgment; and (4) whether the board might reasonably make the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3276 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Patrick L. Wolfe v. Melanie A. Wolfe
judgment awarded sole custody to Melanie, but left open the issue of physical placement. At the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15905 - 2017-09-21
judgment awarded sole custody to Melanie, but left open the issue of physical placement. At the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15905 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael Love
judgment of defense counsel…. [who] is in the best position professionally and ethically to determine when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12875 - 2005-03-31
judgment of defense counsel…. [who] is in the best position professionally and ethically to determine when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12875 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
809.19(1)(e). We could affirm the judgment on these grounds alone, see WIS. STAT. RULE 809.83(2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647746 - 2023-04-20
809.19(1)(e). We could affirm the judgment on these grounds alone, see WIS. STAT. RULE 809.83(2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647746 - 2023-04-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“judgment is plainly influenced by the fact that he’s being paid a lot of money to testify.” ¶15 AT&T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213605 - 2018-05-31
“judgment is plainly influenced by the fact that he’s being paid a lot of money to testify.” ¶15 AT&T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213605 - 2018-05-31
State v. Vlado Gazic
a trial attorney’s ‘considered selection of trial tactics or the exercise of a professional judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3183 - 2005-03-31
a trial attorney’s ‘considered selection of trial tactics or the exercise of a professional judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3183 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the court’s judgment once approved, we review a court’s decision to approve or reject a stipulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100807 - 2017-09-21
the court’s judgment once approved, we review a court’s decision to approve or reject a stipulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100807 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2008AP2614-CRNM Cir. Ct. No. 2007CF4832
of judgment in this felony case. Nothing in § 973.046(1g) requires a DNA sample to be collected before
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40876 - 2014-09-15
of judgment in this felony case. Nothing in § 973.046(1g) requires a DNA sample to be collected before
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40876 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Ray A. Peterson v. Department of Industry
. A reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the agency in regard to the weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11763 - 2017-09-20
. A reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the agency in regard to the weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11763 - 2017-09-20