Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 58821 - 58830 of 83455 for simple case search.
Search results 58821 - 58830 of 83455 for simple case search.
Clarence 2X Price v. Ken Morgan
. The State argues that habeas corpus was not a remedy properly available to Price in this case. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10172 - 2005-03-31
. The State argues that habeas corpus was not a remedy properly available to Price in this case. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10172 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Joseph Engl
2005 WI 102 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2005AP838-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18880 - 2005-07-05
2005 WI 102 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2005AP838-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18880 - 2005-07-05
State v. Frank S. Smith
. The trial court sentenced Smith to a four-year prison term. In doing so the court stated "and in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8921 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court sentenced Smith to a four-year prison term. In doing so the court stated "and in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8921 - 2005-03-31
State v. Martin V. Yanick, Jr.
to inmates who were sentenced prior to its effective date is an issue currently pending in another case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6415 - 2005-03-31
to inmates who were sentenced prior to its effective date is an issue currently pending in another case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6415 - 2005-03-31
State v. Martin V. Yanick, Jr.
to inmates who were sentenced prior to its effective date is an issue currently pending in another case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6416 - 2005-03-31
to inmates who were sentenced prior to its effective date is an issue currently pending in another case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6416 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184035 - 2017-09-21
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184035 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).2 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=406615 - 2021-08-11
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).2 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=406615 - 2021-08-11
COURT OF APPEALS
afforded Ortiz appellate review of his case. He has not offered any reason for failing to raise his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30040 - 2007-08-20
afforded Ortiz appellate review of his case. He has not offered any reason for failing to raise his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30040 - 2007-08-20
[PDF]
Deborah J. Bull v. City of St. Croix Falls
case, and the City offered no evidence in rebuttal. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. ΒΆ2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15664 - 2017-09-21
case, and the City offered no evidence in rebuttal. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. ΒΆ2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15664 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Rodney C.M.
An original dispositional order was entered in this case on March 16, 2001, and was to expire on January 25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5728 - 2017-09-19
An original dispositional order was entered in this case on March 16, 2001, and was to expire on January 25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5728 - 2017-09-19