Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 58871 - 58880 of 68382 for law.

[PDF] State v. Ajuana V. D. Smith
, but the determination of deficient performance and prejudice are questions of law that we No. 02-3116-CR 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5911 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Jon Lancaster, Inc. v. Floor Care Associates, Inc.
was frivolous presents a mixed question of fact and law. Stern v. Thompson & Coates, Ltd., 185 Wis. 2d 220
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6111 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 26, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Ap...
a question of statutory interpretation, an issue of law that we review independently. Thielman v. Leean
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34403 - 2008-10-23

CA Blank Order
’ revocation of operating privileges. Duncan’s sentence is within the range authorized by law, see State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107054 - 2014-01-16

CA Blank Order
probation as a viable disposition: In these matters, the law requires me to start at a situation where
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107627 - 2014-02-04

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
of the State’s evidence was incredible as a matter of law—we are not permitted to unsettle its verdict. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980062 - 2025-07-09

State v. Avery T., Jr.
not controvert any of the facts in this case and we are comfortable applying the law to the undisputed facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8593 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Amanda Osborn v. Cascade Mountain, Inc.
. 1999). In either case, the issue is one of law. Yauger v. Skiing Enters., Inc., 206 Wis. 2d 76, 80
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4734 - 2017-09-19

2007 WI APP 33
of property, the knock-and-announce rule gives individuals an opportunity to comply with the law and avoid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27772 - 2007-02-27

[PDF] Robert E. Taliaferro, Jr. v. Judy Smith
according to law, (3) its action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented the committee’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18891 - 2017-09-21