Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5891 - 5900 of 12796 for se.
Search results 5891 - 5900 of 12796 for se.
State v. Allan D. Schopper
. In his pro se brief, Schopper alleges a series of improprieties and allegations of unfairness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11672 - 2005-03-31
. In his pro se brief, Schopper alleges a series of improprieties and allegations of unfairness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11672 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
Wright appeals pro se from a circuit court order affirming on certiorari review the Division
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29734 - 2014-09-15
Wright appeals pro se from a circuit court order affirming on certiorari review the Division
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29734 - 2014-09-15
State v. Marcellous Walker
Walker appeals, pro se, from an order denying his petition for discharge from his Chapter 980 commitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25050 - 2006-05-08
Walker appeals, pro se, from an order denying his petition for discharge from his Chapter 980 commitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25050 - 2006-05-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
defendant, the circuit court essentially allowed Hazelbaker to be paid for “pro se” work. Griswold argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146714 - 2017-09-21
defendant, the circuit court essentially allowed Hazelbaker to be paid for “pro se” work. Griswold argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146714 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not constitute a per se exigent circumstance sufficient to provide an exemption from the warrant requirement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124802 - 2017-09-21
not constitute a per se exigent circumstance sufficient to provide an exemption from the warrant requirement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124802 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Marcellous Walker
. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Curley and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Marcellous Walker appeals, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25050 - 2017-09-21
. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Curley and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Marcellous Walker appeals, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25050 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
.[1] Robert M. Carmichael, pro se, appeals a small claims replevin judgment granted in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68384 - 2011-07-25
.[1] Robert M. Carmichael, pro se, appeals a small claims replevin judgment granted in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68384 - 2011-07-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, C.J., Gundrum and Hagedorn, JJ. Rodrigo Rodriguez appeals pro se from an order denying, without
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165033 - 2017-09-21
, C.J., Gundrum and Hagedorn, JJ. Rodrigo Rodriguez appeals pro se from an order denying, without
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165033 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Antonio Jones
se [constitutional] barrier to the admission of evidence concerning one’s beliefs and associations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14343 - 2014-09-15
se [constitutional] barrier to the admission of evidence concerning one’s beliefs and associations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14343 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Charles2 appeals pro se from an order of the circuit court. He asks [w]hether it was procedurally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679766 - 2023-07-19
Charles2 appeals pro se from an order of the circuit court. He asks [w]hether it was procedurally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679766 - 2023-07-19