Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 591 - 600 of 30059 for de.
Search results 591 - 600 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
John F. Hernandez v. Patrick E. Behrndt
for a trial de novo and awarding John and Gail Hernandez (the Hernandezes) attorney’s fees. Behrndt argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3515 - 2017-09-19
for a trial de novo and awarding John and Gail Hernandez (the Hernandezes) attorney’s fees. Behrndt argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3515 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Town of Burke v. City of Madison
interpretation which we review de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis.2d 361, 364-65, 560 N.W.2d 315, 317
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14011 - 2014-09-15
interpretation which we review de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis.2d 361, 364-65, 560 N.W.2d 315, 317
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14011 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Town of Burke v. City of Madison
interpretation which we review de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis.2d 361, 364-65, 560 N.W.2d 315, 317
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13521 - 2017-09-21
interpretation which we review de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis.2d 361, 364-65, 560 N.W.2d 315, 317
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13521 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State of Wisconsin-Department of Corrections v. David H. Schwarz
). ¶6 “Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo, and as such, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6714 - 2017-09-20
). ¶6 “Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo, and as such, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6714 - 2017-09-20
George J. and Mary V. Capoun Revocable Trust v. Aftab Ansari
review de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. See Smith v. Dodgeville Mut. Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15456 - 2005-03-31
review de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. See Smith v. Dodgeville Mut. Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15456 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of discretion, but should instead review the matter de novo. ¶9 We could explain why the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122956 - 2014-10-02
of discretion, but should instead review the matter de novo. ¶9 We could explain why the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122956 - 2014-10-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
3 $2116. The Guarneros filed a demand for a hearing de novo before the trial court. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36878 - 2014-09-15
3 $2116. The Guarneros filed a demand for a hearing de novo before the trial court. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36878 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
instead review the matter de novo. ¶9 We could explain why the circuit court’s oral decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122956 - 2014-10-01
instead review the matter de novo. ¶9 We could explain why the circuit court’s oral decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122956 - 2014-10-01
Town of Burke v. City of Madison
de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis.2d 361, 364-65, 560 N.W.2d 315, 317 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13521 - 2005-03-31
de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis.2d 361, 364-65, 560 N.W.2d 315, 317 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13521 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Marcella De Peters Law Office of Marcella De Peters PMB #318 6650 W. State St. Wauwatosa, WI 53213
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208569 - 2018-02-14
Marcella De Peters Law Office of Marcella De Peters PMB #318 6650 W. State St. Wauwatosa, WI 53213
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208569 - 2018-02-14