Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 591 - 600 of 6477 for dr.
Search results 591 - 600 of 6477 for dr.
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Response of Intervenors-Petitioners Wright et al. to Consultants' Report
Page 4 of 28 5 IINTRODUCTION The Report from Dr. Grofman and Dr. Cervas confirms the Wright
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0208intervenorspetitionersresponse.pdf - 2024-02-08
Page 4 of 28 5 IINTRODUCTION The Report from Dr. Grofman and Dr. Cervas confirms the Wright
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0208intervenorspetitionersresponse.pdf - 2024-02-08
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel: (1) testimony by Dr. Beth Huebner, the State’s expert, was improperly admitted as Jensen[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58887 - 2011-01-12
counsel: (1) testimony by Dr. Beth Huebner, the State’s expert, was improperly admitted as Jensen[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58887 - 2011-01-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
to by his trial counsel: (1) testimony by Dr. Beth Huebner, the State’s expert, was improperly admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58887 - 2014-09-15
to by his trial counsel: (1) testimony by Dr. Beth Huebner, the State’s expert, was improperly admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58887 - 2014-09-15
94 CV 380 Evelyn J. Fraser v. Daniel R. Marcussen
could get final opinions, and that if the defense wanted to telephone the main treating physician, Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11861 - 2005-03-31
could get final opinions, and that if the defense wanted to telephone the main treating physician, Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11861 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
94 CV 380 Evelyn J. Fraser v. Daniel R. Marcussen
, and that if the defense wanted to telephone the main treating physician, Dr. Paul Searles, they could do so and schedule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11861 - 2017-09-21
, and that if the defense wanted to telephone the main treating physician, Dr. Paul Searles, they could do so and schedule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11861 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeffrey L. Posthuma
condition as testified to by Dr. Patricia Staats. She testified that the child's vaginal hymen was almost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8016 - 2005-03-31
condition as testified to by Dr. Patricia Staats. She testified that the child's vaginal hymen was almost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8016 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Dr. Marcus referred to this eluding incident. Dr. Marcus testified that he was “worried about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1106998 - 2026-04-23
, Dr. Marcus referred to this eluding incident. Dr. Marcus testified that he was “worried about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1106998 - 2026-04-23
State v. Dean Garfoot
., as a result of an incident that took place on April 27, 1993. Dr. Spierer, one of the two court-appointed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7956 - 2005-03-31
., as a result of an incident that took place on April 27, 1993. Dr. Spierer, one of the two court-appointed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7956 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dean Garfoot
., as a result of an incident that took place on April 27, 1993. Dr. Spierer, one of the two court-appointed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7956 - 2017-09-19
., as a result of an incident that took place on April 27, 1993. Dr. Spierer, one of the two court-appointed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7956 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
David W. Junge v. Peter W. Messer, M.D.
case brought against Dr. Peter W. Messer seeking a refund and bill cancellation for medical bills
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20858 - 2017-09-21
case brought against Dr. Peter W. Messer seeking a refund and bill cancellation for medical bills
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20858 - 2017-09-21