Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 591 - 600 of 1070 for lois.

Thomas Moullette v. City of Rice Lake
, and, using a demonstrated rational process, reached a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach.” Loy v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4915 - 2005-03-31

2009 WI APP 122
decision. Loy v. Bunderson, 107 Wis. 2d 400, 414-15, 320 N.W.2d 175 (1982). β€œ[W]e will independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38152 - 2009-08-25

[PDF] Nanette M.M. v. Gerald J.M.
could reach. Loy v. Bunderson, 107 Wis.2d 400, 414-15, 320 N.W.2d 175, 184 (1982). A court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8911 - 2017-09-19

Jami L. Van Boxtel v. Brent F. Van Boxtel
rational process to reach a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach. See Loy v. Bunderson, 107 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15104 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Winnebago County v. Kurt J. K.
a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach. Loy v. Bunderson, 107 Wis. 2d 400, 414-15, 320 N.W.2d 175
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5084 - 2017-09-19

State v. Khue Xiong
rational process, reached a conclusion that a reasonable judge would reach. Loy v. Bunderson, 107 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19888 - 2005-10-10

[PDF] Kelly Diestler v. Thomas J. Juza Custom Home & Design, Inc.
rational process to reach a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach. See Loy v. Bunderson, 107
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5975 - 2017-09-19

State v. Nou Yang
judge could reach. Loy v. Bunderson, 107 Wis. 2d 400, 414–415, 320 N.W.2d 175, 184 (1982). ΒΆ12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5721 - 2005-03-31

Winnebago County v. Kurt J. K.
a demonstrated rational process, reached a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach. Loy v. Bunderson, 107
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5084 - 2005-03-31

Harvest Savings Bank v. ROI Investments
order to CNB to reimburse ROI for the overpayment was a proper exercise of its discretion. Cf. Loy v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14374 - 2005-03-31