Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 591 - 600 of 2436 for nys.
Search results 591 - 600 of 2436 for nys.
COURT OF APPEALS
motion.” Id. at 185; see also Wis. Stat. § 974.06(4) (“[a]ny ground finally adjudicated or not so raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41323 - 2009-09-28
motion.” Id. at 185; see also Wis. Stat. § 974.06(4) (“[a]ny ground finally adjudicated or not so raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41323 - 2009-09-28
Laverne McCoy v. Board of Fire and Police Commissioner for the City of Milwaukee
that an employee's right to inspect personnel records does not apply to “[a]ny portion of a test document” except
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9549 - 2005-03-31
that an employee's right to inspect personnel records does not apply to “[a]ny portion of a test document” except
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9549 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. CODE § DOC 303.271 states that “[a]ny inmate who makes a false written or oral statement about
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161495 - 2017-09-21
. CODE § DOC 303.271 states that “[a]ny inmate who makes a false written or oral statement about
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161495 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Thomas Willan v. Charlene Brereton
of that controversy. See State v. Iglesias, 185 Wis. 2d 117, 132-33, 517 N.W.2d 175 (1994). By statute, “[a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15744 - 2017-09-21
of that controversy. See State v. Iglesias, 185 Wis. 2d 117, 132-33, 517 N.W.2d 175 (1994). By statute, “[a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15744 - 2017-09-21
Kenneth A. Volden v. Loni Koenig
. § 51.61(1) defines the word “patient” as: [A]ny individual who is receiving services for mental illness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3619 - 2005-03-31
. § 51.61(1) defines the word “patient” as: [A]ny individual who is receiving services for mental illness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3619 - 2005-03-31
Debra J. Wall v. Michael K. Wall
to consider “[a]ny other factors which the court in each case determines are relevant” to its decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12252 - 2005-03-31
to consider “[a]ny other factors which the court in each case determines are relevant” to its decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12252 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
) permits courts to reopen a case for “[a]ny other reasons justifying relief from the operation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894685 - 2024-12-26
) permits courts to reopen a case for “[a]ny other reasons justifying relief from the operation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894685 - 2024-12-26
Robert J. Hillis v. Village of Fox Point Board of Appeals
Point Code defines a “nonconforming use” as “[a]ny use of a building or premises which does not conform
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7584 - 2005-05-24
Point Code defines a “nonconforming use” as “[a]ny use of a building or premises which does not conform
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7584 - 2005-05-24
State v. Christopher James
. (1973), provided that “rape” was committed by “[a]ny male who has sexual intercourse with a female he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8869 - 2005-03-31
. (1973), provided that “rape” was committed by “[a]ny male who has sexual intercourse with a female he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8869 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or stipulation for … [a]ny other reasons justifying relief from the operation of the judgment.” Subsection (h
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231327 - 2018-12-26
or stipulation for … [a]ny other reasons justifying relief from the operation of the judgment.” Subsection (h
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231327 - 2018-12-26