Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 591 - 600 of 7577 for yes.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
? [SLACK]: Yes, sir. THE COURT: You knew that? [SLACK]: Yes, sir. THE COURT: Okay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243956 - 2019-07-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, a restraining order in place? [OFFICER MUSSATI:] I did, yes. [THE PROSECUTOR:] And did you also confirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446897 - 2021-11-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
had been cancelled]? A. Yes. Q. Which was a Monday. And if I look on the calendar, 8/5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135470 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
to represent yourself? A: Yes, sir. Q: You understand representing yourself you are at somewhat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36434 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
that it believed his insurance had been cancelled]? A. Yes. Q. Which was a Monday. And if I look on the calendar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135470 - 2015-02-23

[PDF] State v. Daniel J. Jurkovic
. At that point, Officer Walsh told Jurkovic that she needed a yes or no answer. Jurkovic did not respond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16299 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
? A: Yes, I do. Q: Okay. Who told you that? Who told you what you were charged with? A: I believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108889 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
instruction? THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir. 2 We note
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210361 - 2018-03-27

COURT OF APPEALS
with Chileski: Q: You wish to represent yourself? A: Yes, sir. Q: You understand representing yourself you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36434 - 2009-05-06

[PDF] State v. William M. Schleck
. Is that your signature? THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir. No. 00-1483-CR 7 THE COURT: Have you had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2653 - 2017-09-19