Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5901 - 5910 of 18662 for quote.

[PDF] State v. Jon W. Miller
as well. The affidavit does not purport to quote Miller’s mother. The alleged omission, that Miller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3928 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] County of Langlade v. Stanley S. Drabek
’" the investigatory stop. Id. (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21 (1968)). The evidence discloses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11627 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] LeeAnn Guerndt v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
a claim." Id. (quoting Erickson v. DILHR, 49 Wis.2d 114, 118, 181 N.W.2d 495, 497 (1970
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8528 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of reasonable suspicion is not a requirement of absolute certainty.’” (quoted source omitted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249879 - 2019-11-07

COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 106 (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 30 (1968)). The question is, “under all the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29988 - 2007-08-15

Timm Armour v. Milwaukee Transport Services, Inc.
. Co. v. Hunzinger Constr. Co., 179 Wis.2d 281, 293, 507 N.W.2d 136, 140 (Ct. App. 1993) (quoted source
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12277 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jimmie L. Perkins
, the gravity of the offense and the rehabilitative needs of the defendant.’” Id., ¶44 (quoting McCleary v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7280 - 2005-03-31

State v. Willie Burnside
outweighed by the danger of undue prejudice. Id. (quoted source omitted). Burnside complains that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13649 - 2005-03-31

Annette J. Mueller v. Charles R. Mueller
.” LaRocque v. LaRocque, 139 Wis.2d 23, 27, 406 N.W.2d 736, 737 (1987) (quotations and quoted source omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10093 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
(quoted source omitted). It is not necessary that the criminal purpose be the defendant’s only purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102298 - 2013-09-25