Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5901 - 5910 of 64449 for records/1000.

Wisconsin Power and Light Company v. Langlade County Board of Adjustment
and represented its will, not its judgment; and (4) the circuit court correctly reviewed the record. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8922 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable basis for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132741 - 2015-01-12

[PDF] State v. Jamal D. Jones
no such showing here, and because the record reflects a proper waiver of the right to a twelve-person jury, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9217 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
such a decision only if the trial court “applie[d] the wrong legal standard or if the facts of record fail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526428 - 2022-06-01

[PDF] NOTICE
. The Hofackers’ argument is heavily dependent upon facts No. 2009AP2769 5 in the record. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53590 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
contends that the circuit court erred in denying her request for public records of a power point
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540095 - 2022-07-06

[PDF] State v. Michael Washington
sentencing recommendation. The record also shows that Deputy District Attorney Michael Nieskes was assigned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8611 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Wisconsin Power and Light Company v. Langlade County Board of Adjustment
the record. We reject WPL's contentions. Because there is at least one reasonable basis for the board's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8922 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Village of Deerfield v.
is codified in § 910.02, STATS., provides that “[t]o prove the content of a writing, recording or photograph
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11781 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Johnny Russo
; and (3) the jury was erroneously allowed during deliberation to listen to a tape recording of a phone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6281 - 2017-09-19