Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59001 - 59010 of 83387 for simple case search.
Search results 59001 - 59010 of 83387 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926616 - 2025-03-12
and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926616 - 2025-03-12
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circumstances, “the facts of the case would warrant a reasonable police officer, in light of his or her training
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88591 - 2014-01-27
of the circumstances, “the facts of the case would warrant a reasonable police officer, in light of his or her training
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88591 - 2014-01-27
Deborah J. Bull v. City of St. Croix Falls
property sustained damage from continued mud seepage. Bull established a prima facie case, and the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15664 - 2005-03-31
property sustained damage from continued mud seepage. Bull established a prima facie case, and the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15664 - 2005-03-31
State v. Allan R. Washachek
criminal proceeding, or even future criminal liability in this case. Rather, the procedure was used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2526 - 2012-08-20
criminal proceeding, or even future criminal liability in this case. Rather, the procedure was used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2526 - 2012-08-20
State v. Frank E. Ratcliff
factors justifying a reduced sentence, counsel correctly notes that none are present in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12991 - 2005-03-31
factors justifying a reduced sentence, counsel correctly notes that none are present in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12991 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and to dismiss and read in charges in a separate case. The State also agreed to cap its recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483780 - 2022-02-17
and to dismiss and read in charges in a separate case. The State also agreed to cap its recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483780 - 2022-02-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the case and addresses the validity of Graveen’s pleas and sentences. Graveen was informed of her right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078981 - 2026-02-17
of the case and addresses the validity of Graveen’s pleas and sentences. Graveen was informed of her right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078981 - 2026-02-17
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=334243 - 2021-02-08
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=334243 - 2021-02-08
State v. Randolph O. Neumeyer
a routine traffic stop. Id. at 448, 475 N.W.2d at 153. But, according to Neumeyer, the subsequent case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10206 - 2005-03-31
a routine traffic stop. Id. at 448, 475 N.W.2d at 153. But, according to Neumeyer, the subsequent case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10206 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
with the lawyer and was advised not to talk to him, he would finish up with a few details and submit the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35549 - 2014-09-15
with the lawyer and was advised not to talk to him, he would finish up with a few details and submit the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35549 - 2014-09-15