Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59051 - 59060 of 61723 for judgment.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
not substitute our “judgment for that of the trier of fact unless the evidence, viewed most favorably to the [S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=596782 - 2022-12-06

[PDF] Spickler Enterprises, Ltd. v. Department of Revenue
, but to the extent the Commission made factual findings, we may not substitute our judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12220 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] LDC-728 Milwaukee, LLC v. Frauchigers, LLC
is entitled to an eviction judgment against Frauchigers. Accordingly, the trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19238 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and represented its will, not its judgment; and (4) whether the evidence was such that it might reasonably make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120143 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that would support probable cause, see id., ¶9, but instead substituted its judgment for the officer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108909 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, as reflected on the judgment of conviction. For the sake of simplicity, I ignore the $79.99 portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110449 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Kenneth Krebs v. David H. Schwarz
. As long as the division acted upon a rational basis and the action represented its judgment and not its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11402 - 2017-09-19

State v. Richard Austin
N.W.2d 228 (Ct. App. 1995). [4] We express no judgment as to whether Austin may have legitimate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7269 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the entry of the parties’ divorce judgment because he had “switched [his] primary place of employment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=292220 - 2020-09-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was resolved by the [circuit court] in a manner which supports the final judgment.” Id. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123009 - 2014-10-02