Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59091 - 59100 of 64735 for b's.
Search results 59091 - 59100 of 64735 for b's.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
it” that there is a factual basis to support the charge. WIS. STAT. § 971.08(1)(b); see State v. Smith, 202 Wis. 2d 21, 25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300018 - 2020-10-29
it” that there is a factual basis to support the charge. WIS. STAT. § 971.08(1)(b); see State v. Smith, 202 Wis. 2d 21, 25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300018 - 2020-10-29
State v. Quincy Ferguson
, and disbursements of the agent appointed to return a defendant from another state or country. (b) Fees
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16953 - 2005-03-31
, and disbursements of the agent appointed to return a defendant from another state or country. (b) Fees
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16953 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or the fine. B. DNA Surcharge Rogers’ offense was committed in March 2013; he was sentenced on January 17
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175498 - 2017-09-21
or the fine. B. DNA Surcharge Rogers’ offense was committed in March 2013; he was sentenced on January 17
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175498 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)4.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071502 - 2026-02-03
. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)4.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071502 - 2026-02-03
COURT OF APPEALS
809.23(1)(b)5. (2011-12). [1] Alternatively, the State argues the court did not erroneously rescind
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110319 - 2014-04-14
809.23(1)(b)5. (2011-12). [1] Alternatively, the State argues the court did not erroneously rescind
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110319 - 2014-04-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)4. No. 2018AP2412-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258000 - 2020-04-16
will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)4. No. 2018AP2412-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258000 - 2020-04-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)4.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610228 - 2023-01-18
will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)4.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610228 - 2023-01-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
developed arguments). No. 2008AP3114-CR 7 B. Sentencing Discretion. ¶14 Morrison contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36519 - 2014-09-15
developed arguments). No. 2008AP3114-CR 7 B. Sentencing Discretion. ¶14 Morrison contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36519 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
906.15(2)(b). We agree with counsel’s conclusion that a sequestration request would not have prevented
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155646 - 2017-09-21
906.15(2)(b). We agree with counsel’s conclusion that a sequestration request would not have prevented
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155646 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Richard E. Davis
.—Judgment and order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See RULE 809.23(1)(b)4, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14557 - 2017-09-21
.—Judgment and order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See RULE 809.23(1)(b)4, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14557 - 2017-09-21