Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5911 - 5920 of 82663 for case codes/1000.
Search results 5911 - 5920 of 82663 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Ralph Ovadal
by the definition of "erect" in WIS. ADMIN. CODE § TRANS 200.015(2)(g). The facts of this case encompass those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15840 - 2017-09-21
by the definition of "erect" in WIS. ADMIN. CODE § TRANS 200.015(2)(g). The facts of this case encompass those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15840 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to suppress because it determined that Schlueter observed a traffic code violation when Popke crossed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33681 - 2008-08-06
to suppress because it determined that Schlueter observed a traffic code violation when Popke crossed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33681 - 2008-08-06
[PDF]
Supreme Court rule petition memo 17-03
by supreme court order, today’s statute remains nearly identical to the 1849 Field Code. 4 In 1971
/supreme/docs/1703memo.pdf - 2017-03-17
by supreme court order, today’s statute remains nearly identical to the 1849 Field Code. 4 In 1971
/supreme/docs/1703memo.pdf - 2017-03-17
[PDF]
Kenosha Hospital & Medical Center v. Jesus E. Garcia
. We disagree with Richter Industries that the Bar Code case controls our decision in the present
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16643 - 2017-09-21
. We disagree with Richter Industries that the Bar Code case controls our decision in the present
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16643 - 2017-09-21
Kenosha Hospital & Medical Center v. Jesus E. Garcia
2004 WI 105 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 02-1727 Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16643 - 2005-03-31
2004 WI 105 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 02-1727 Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16643 - 2005-03-31
City of Wautoma v. David H. Jansen
of the Wautoma city ordinances. He argues that: (1) his case was illegally tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9249 - 2005-03-31
of the Wautoma city ordinances. He argues that: (1) his case was illegally tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9249 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William W. Gandt
proposition. He cites instead a case that discusses public policy concerns based on the administrative code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10434 - 2017-09-20
proposition. He cites instead a case that discusses public policy concerns based on the administrative code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10434 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
City of Wautoma v. David H. Jansen
ordinances. He argues that: (1) his case was illegally tried to a jury; (2) he was denied due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9249 - 2017-09-19
ordinances. He argues that: (1) his case was illegally tried to a jury; (2) he was denied due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9249 - 2017-09-19
State v. William W. Gandt
a case that discusses public policy concerns based on the administrative code regarding employment issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10434 - 2005-03-31
a case that discusses public policy concerns based on the administrative code regarding employment issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10434 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
court for Waukesha County: KATHRYN W. FOSTER, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 BROWN, C.J.1 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30622 - 2014-09-15
court for Waukesha County: KATHRYN W. FOSTER, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 BROWN, C.J.1 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30622 - 2014-09-15