Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5911 - 5920 of 29942 for des.

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
Ackerville’s motion and entered judgment accordingly. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review summary judgments de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28128 - 2007-03-27

State v. Ernest E. Burton
, whether the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3479 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Stephen J.C.
. 48, we conduct that part of our review de novo. See Sallie T., 219 Wis. 2d at 305, 581 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2173 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Roger D. Johnson v. ABC Insurance Company
judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-17, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4722 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 102
level of review, the de novo standard, is applied where it is clear from the lack of agency precedent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32888 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, which we review de novo. State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶9, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125451 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 204
by the facts in a particular case is a question of law for appellate courts, reviewable de novo. Salveson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26538 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
corners is a question of law we review de novo. See id., ¶¶9, 23. If the motion does not raise
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669025 - 2023-06-20

General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. Lee Nicholas
of law, we review the question de novo, benefiting from the trial court’s analysis. See id. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6598 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
denied Marsh’s motion.5 ¶8 Marsh sought a de novo hearing before the circuit court, and the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370395 - 2021-05-25